» Articles » PMID: 39384066

Design of Project STAR: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of an Adaptive Intervention on Long-term Weight-loss Maintenance

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2024 Oct 9
PMID 39384066
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Without provision of additional intervention, most individuals regain weight after the end of weight-loss programs. Extended-care programs have been demonstrated to improve long-term weight-loss maintenance, but effects are modest.

Methods: We proposed to evaluate whether delivering extended-care telephone sessions on an ADAPTIVE (provided when individuals are deemed to be at high-risk for weight regain) versus STATIC (the once-per-month schedule typically used in extended-care programs) schedule improves weight regain after initial weight loss. Adults with obesity were initially recruited for a 16-week lifestyle weight-loss program, and those who lost ≥5 % of their initial weight were eligible for enrollment in the Project STAR maintenance trial.

Results: A total of 449 individuals (mean ± SD age = 49.5 ± 11.4 years, BMI = 35.7 ± 4.0 kg/m, 83.5 % female, 23.4 % Black or African American, 9.8 % Hispanic) were recruited for the initial weight-loss program and lost an average of 6.4 ± 4.9 % of their initial body weight; 255 were randomized to the maintenance trial. There were no significant differences between participants randomized to the trial versus those who were not in terms of baseline weight, gender, race/ethnicity, education, or marital status, all ps > 0.05; however, participants who were randomized to the trial were older, p = .014, and reported higher incomes, p < .001.

Conclusion: Results from Project STAR will demonstrate whether providing extended-care intervention on an individually adaptable schedule improves long-term weight-loss maintenance. Moreover, the rich longitudinal dataset collected during the trial will serve as a foundation for building future predictive algorithms of weight regain and novel weight-maintenance interventions.

References
1.
Pebley K, Klesges R, Talcott G, Kocak M, Krukowski R . Measurement Equivalence of E-Scale and In-Person Clinic Weights. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019; 27(7):1107-1114. PMC: 7575123. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22512. View

2.
Sherwood N, Crain A, Martinson B, Anderson C, Hayes M, Anderson J . Enhancing long-term weight loss maintenance: 2 year results from the Keep It Off randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2013; 56(3-4):171-7. PMC: 3582705. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.014. View

3.
Chomistek A, Yuan C, Matthews C, Troiano R, Bowles H, Rood J . Physical Activity Assessment with the ActiGraph GT3X and Doubly Labeled Water. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017; 49(9):1935-1944. PMC: 5561512. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001299. View

4.
Roenneberg T, Wirz-Justice A, Merrow M . Life between clocks: daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes. J Biol Rhythms. 2003; 18(1):80-90. DOI: 10.1177/0748730402239679. View

5.
Wadden T, Volger S, Sarwer D, Vetter M, Tsai A, Berkowitz R . A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(21):1969-79. PMC: 3282598. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109220. View