» Articles » PMID: 39382001

Glycaemic Outcomes in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes over 34 weeks with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Oct 9
PMID 39382001
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aim was to evaluate the effect of extended use of the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System in adults with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control.

Materials And Methods: Following an 8-week single-arm, multicentre, outpatient trial of AID in adults with type 2 diabetes and baseline HbA1c ≥ 8% (≥ 64 mmol/mol), participants were given the opportunity to continue use of the AID system in a 26-week (~6 month) extension phase. The primary safety endpoints were percentage of time with sensor glucose ≥ 250 mg/dL and < 54 mg/dL. Additional glycaemic measures, including percentage of time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) and HbA1c, were evaluated. The use of non-insulin anti-hyperglycaemic medications was permitted throughout the entire study.

Results: During the initial 8-week study, participants (N = 22) achieved a decrease in percentage of time ≥ 250 mg/dL from 27.4% ± 21.0% to 10.5% ± 8.8% (p < 0.0001), which further decreased to 9.7% ± 9.2% during the extension phase (p = 0.0002 vs. standard therapy). Percentage of time < 54 mg/dL remained low from standard therapy through extension (median [interquartile range] 0.00% [0.00%, 0.06%] vs. 0.02% [0.00%, 0.05%], p > 0.05). HbA1c decreased by 1.6% ± 1.2% (15.5 ± 13.1 mmol/mol, p < 0.0001) and TIR increased by 22.4% ± 19.2% (p < 0.0001) from standard therapy through extension with no significant change in body mass index and without an observed increase in total daily insulin requirements.

Conclusions: These longer-term findings of Omnipod 5 AID System use demonstrate the potential value of AID in helping people with type 2 diabetes reach glycaemic targets.

Citing Articles

Glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes over 34 weeks with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System.

Davis G, Peters A, Bode B, Carlson A, Dumais B, Vienneau T Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 27(1):143-154.

PMID: 39382001 PMC: 11618232. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15993.

References
1.
Khunti K, Wolden M, Thorsted B, Andersen M, Davies M . Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(11):3411-7. PMC: 3816889. DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0331. View

2.
Garber A, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, Einhorn D, Abrahamson M, Barzilay J . CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - . Endocr Pract. 2020; 26(1):107-139. DOI: 10.4158/CS-2019-0472. View

3.
Davies M, Aroda V, Collins B, Gabbay R, Green J, Maruthur N . Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(11):2753-2786. PMC: 10008140. DOI: 10.2337/dci22-0034. View

4.
Zoungas S, Arima H, Gerstein H, Holman R, Woodward M, Reaven P . Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017; 5(6):431-437. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30104-3. View

5.
Davis G, Peters A, Bode B, Carlson A, Dumais B, Vienneau T . Safety and Efficacy of the Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: From Injections to Hybrid Closed-Loop Therapy. Diabetes Care. 2023; 46(4):742-750. PMC: 10090930. DOI: 10.2337/dc22-1915. View