Monitoring Clonal Burden As an Alternative to Blast Count for Myelodysplastic Neoplasm Treatment Response

Accurate assessment of therapy response in myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) has been challenging. Directly monitoring mutational disease burden may be useful, but is not currently included in MDS response criteria, and the correlation of mutational burden and traditional response endpoints is not completely understood. Here, we used genome-wide and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to monitor clonal and subclonal molecular disease burden in 452 samples from 32 patients prospectively treated in a clinical trial. Molecular responses were compared with International Working Group (IWG) 2006-defined response assessments. We found that myeloblast percentage consistently underestimates MDS molecular disease burden and that mutational clearance patterns for marrow complete remission (mCR), which depends on myeloblast assessment, was not different than stable disease or bone marrow aplasia, underscoring a major limitation of using mCR. In contrast, achieving a complete remission (CR) was associated with the highest level of mutation clearance and lowest residual mutational burden in higher-risk MDS patients. A targeted gene panel approach was inferior to genome-wide sequencing in defining subclones and their molecular responses but may be adequate for monitoring molecular disease burden when a targeted gene is present in the founding clone. Our work supports incorporating serial NGS-based monitoring into prospective MDS clinical trials.