Intrarater and Inter-rater Reliability of Tibial Plateau Fracture Classifications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview

Journal JB JS Open Access

Date 2024 Oct 4

PMID 39364175

Authors

Fardis Vosoughi

Iman Menbari Oskouie

Nazanin Rahimdoost

Amir Kasaeian

Arash Sherafat Vaziri

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of various tibial plateau fracture (TPF) classifications has been examined in recent literature using radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The question remains as to which classification system provides the highest reliability. In this systematic review, we are going to evaluate the overall interobserver and intraobserver reliability of various TPF classifications in different imaging modalities.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In February 2023, predefined terms were used for database search (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science). Meta-analysis of intrarater and inter-rater kappa coefficients was performed for each of the classifications in each modality.

Results: Thirty-four studies were included in this review. Schatzker's classification was more frequently used than others. It had a better intrarater kappa coefficient than the Hohl and Moore and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classifications in radiography (κ = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.76, p < 0.01). The Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications had similar inter-rater reliability in the radiography modality (κ = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.51-0.54, p < 0.01; κ = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.5-0.55, p < 0.01; respectively). In 3-dimensional computed tomography, the Luo classification system showed the highest intrarater (κ = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.35-0.66) and inter-rater (κ = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.73-0.81) kappa coefficients.

Conclusion: Three-column classification proposed by Luo et al. was able to reach the highest degree and was the only classification with near-excellent inter-rater reliability.

Citing Articles

Radiological outcomes of surgical techniques for spastic hip in cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oskouie I, Hakiminejad A, Yazdanmehr A, Mostafavi K, Mafhoumi A, Sajedi A J Orthop Traumatol. 2025; 26(1):13.

PMID: 40021534 PMC: 11871257. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-025-00827-0.

References

Zhu Y, Yang G, Luo C, Smith W, Hu C, Gao H . Computed tomography-based Three-Column Classification in tibial plateau fractures: introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73(3):731-7. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825c17e7. View

Vosoughi F, Makuku R, Tantuoyir M, Yousefi F, Shobeiri P, Karimi A . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 in children. BMC Pediatr. 2022; 22(1):613. PMC: 9587668. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03624-4. View

Luo C, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng B . Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24(11):683-92. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d436f3. View

Millan-Billi A, Gomez-Masdeu M, Ramirez-Bermejo E, Ibanez M, Gelber P . What is the most reproducible classification system to assess tibial plateau fractures?. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(6):1251-1256. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3462-x. View

Aghaghazvini L, Tahmasebi M, Gerami R, Vaziri A, Rasuli B, Tahami M . Sonography: a sensitive and specific method for detecting trochlear cartilage pathologies. J Ultrasound. 2020; 23(3):259-263. PMC: 7441103. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-020-00488-1. View

Charalambous C, Tryfonidis M, Alvi F, Moran M, Fang C, Samarji R . Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007; 89(4):400-4. PMC: 1963574. DOI: 10.1308/003588407X187667. View

Walton N, Harish S, Roberts C, Blundell C . AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123(8):396-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-003-0573-1. View

Chan P, Klimkiewicz J, Luchetti W, Esterhai J, Kneeland J, Dalinka M . Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11(7):484-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199710000-00005. View

Furuya-Kanamori L, Kostoulas P, Doi S . A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 132:51-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.015. View

10.

Gicquel T, Najihi N, Vendeuvre T, Teyssedou S, Gayet L, Huten D . Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(7):805-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.007. View

11.

Huitema J, van der Gaast N, Brouwers L, Jaarsma R, Doornberg J, Edwards M . Are 3D-printed Models of Tibial Plateau Fractures a Useful Addition to Understanding Fractures for Junior Surgeons?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022; 480(6):1170-1177. PMC: 9263500. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002137. View

12.

Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

13.

Zhang B, Sun H, Zhan Y, He Q, Zhu Y, Wang Y . Reliability and repeatability of tibial plateau fracture assessment with an injury mechanism-based concept. Bone Joint Res. 2019; 8(8):357-366. PMC: 6719528. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.88.BJR-2018-0331.R1. View

14.

Te Stroet M, Holla M, Biert J, Van Kampen A . The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures. Emerg Radiol. 2011; 18(4):279-83. PMC: 3139878. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-010-0932-5. View

15.

Yacoubian S, Nevins R, Sallis J, Potter H, Lorich D . Impact of MRI on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002; 16(9):632-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200210000-00004. View

16.

Molenaars R, Mellema J, Doornberg J, Kloen P . Tibial Plateau Fracture Characteristics: Computed Tomography Mapping of Lateral, Medial, and Bicondylar Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(18):1512-20. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00866. View

17.

Mansur H, Correa V, Abdo B, Ramos L, Castiglia M . Evaluation of the Reproducibility of the Schatzker Classification Reviewed by Kfuri for Tibial Plateau Fractures. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022; 57(3):502-510. PMC: 9246522. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729577. View

18.

Patzold R, Friederichs J, von Ruden C, Panzer S, Buhren V, Augat P . The pivotal role of the coronal fracture line for a new three-dimensional CT-based fracture classification of bicondylar proximal tibial fractures. Injury. 2017; 48(10):2214-2220. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.019. View

19.

Zhu Y, Hu C, Yang G, Cheng D, Luo C . Inter-observer reliability assessment of the Schatzker, AO/OTA and three-column classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2013; 7(1):7. PMC: 3848575. DOI: 10.1186/1752-2897-7-7. View

20.

Marsh J, Slongo T, Agel J, Broderick J, Creevey W, DeCoster T . Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 21(10 Suppl):S1-133. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001. View