» Articles » PMID: 21394519

The Value of a CT Scan Compared to Plain Radiographs for the Classification and Treatment Plan in Tibial Plateau Fractures

Overview
Journal Emerg Radiol
Date 2011 Mar 12
PMID 21394519
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement for both fracture classification according to Schatzker and treatment plan of tibial plateau fractures using plain radiographs alone and with computed tomography (CT) scans. The study was carried out prospectively to assess the impact of an advanced radiographic study on the agreement of treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. Eight experienced observers (six surgeons and two radiologists) classified 15 tibial plateau fractures with plain radiographs and CT scans and set up a treatment plan. Agreement was measured using kappa coefficients. Using plain radiographs alone, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient for classification was 0.47, which decreased to 0.46 after addition of CT scans. Using plain films alone for formulating a treatment plan, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient was 0.40, which decreased to 0.30 after addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for fracture classification using plain radiographs was 0.60, which decreased to 0.57 with addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for treatment plan based on plain radiographs alone was 0.53, which decreased to 0.45 after addition of CT scans. In contrast with other recent publications, there is no increase in inter- and intra-agreement of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures. Routine CT scanning of the knee for tibial plateau fractures is not supported by this study.

Citing Articles

Intrarater and Inter-rater Reliability of Tibial Plateau Fracture Classifications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vosoughi F, Oskouie I, Rahimdoost N, Kasaeian A, Sherafat Vaziri A JB JS Open Access. 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39364175 PMC: 11444555. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00181.


Introduction and An Analysis of Inter- and Intra-observer Validity to the Classification of Hoffa-Like Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Wang Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, Ye P, Zhu Y, Chen W Orthop Surg. 2023; 16(1):132-139.

PMID: 38049381 PMC: 10782227. DOI: 10.1111/os.13960.


Efficacy of Cal-Cemex as bone substitute for tibial plateau fractures.

Pizzoli A, Bondi M, Piotto L, Tartaglia N, Saracino M, Vyrva O J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):836.

PMID: 37932755 PMC: 10626643. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04323-1.


The effect of addition of 2DCT scans and 3DCT scans for the classification of tibial plateau fractures: a systematic review.

Huitema J, van der Gaast N, Jaarsma R, Doornberg J, Edwards M, Hermans E Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023; 50(1):71-79.

PMID: 37768386 PMC: 10923987. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02344-3.


The symmetry of the left and right tibial plateau: a comparison of 200 tibial plateaus.

van der Gaast N, Dunning H, Huitema J, Waters A, Jaarsma R, Doornberg J Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022; 49(1):69-74.

PMID: 35829733 PMC: 9925587. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02043-5.


References
1.
Chan P, Klimkiewicz J, Luchetti W, Esterhai J, Kneeland J, Dalinka M . Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11(7):484-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199710000-00005. View

2.
. Radiation dose in computed tomography: why it's a concern and what you can do about it. Health Devices. 2007; 36(2):41-2, 44-63. View

3.
Papagelopoulos P, Partsinevelos A, Themistocleous G, Mavrogenis A, Korres D, Soucacos P . Complications after tibia plateau fracture surgery. Injury. 2005; 37(6):475-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.035. View

4.
Dunn G . Design and analysis of reliability studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1992; 1(2):123-57. DOI: 10.1177/096228029200100202. View

5.
Hall E, Brenner D . Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008; 81(965):362-78. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/01948454. View