» Articles » PMID: 39334480

Comparative Hox Genes Expression Within the Dimorphic Annelid Streblospio Benedicti Reveals Patterning Variation During Development

Overview
Journal Evodevo
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Sep 28
PMID 39334480
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hox genes are transcriptional regulators that elicit cell positional identity along the anterior-posterior region of the body plan across different lineages of Metazoan. Comparison of Hox gene expression across distinct species reveals their evolutionary conservation; however, their gains and losses in different lineages can correlate with body plan modifications and morphological novelty. We compare the expression of 11 Hox genes found within Streblospio benedicti, a marine annelid that produces two types of offspring with distinct developmental and morphological features. For these two distinct larval types, we compare Hox gene expression through ontogeny using hybridization chain reaction (HCR) probes for in situ hybridization and RNA-seq data. We find that Hox gene expression patterning for both types is typically similar at equivalent developmental stages. However, some Hox genes have spatial or temporal differences between the larval types that are associated with morphological and life-history differences. This is the first comparison of developmental divergence in Hox gene expression within a single species and these changes reveal how body plan differences may arise in larval evolution.

References
1.
Afzal Z, Krumlauf R . Transcriptional Regulation and Implications for Controlling Gene Expression. J Dev Biol. 2022; 10(1). PMC: 8788451. DOI: 10.3390/jdb10010004. View

2.
Albertin C, Simakov O, Mitros T, Wang Z, Pungor J, Edsinger-Gonzales E . The octopus genome and the evolution of cephalopod neural and morphological novelties. Nature. 2015; 524(7564):220-4. PMC: 4795812. DOI: 10.1038/nature14668. View

3.
Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D . Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215(3):403-10. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. View

4.
Anisimova M, Gil M, Dufayard J, Dessimoz C, Gascuel O . Survey of branch support methods demonstrates accuracy, power, and robustness of fast likelihood-based approximation schemes. Syst Biol. 2011; 60(5):685-99. PMC: 3158332. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr041. View

5.
Buccitelli C, Selbach M . mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. Nat Rev Genet. 2020; 21(10):630-644. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-020-0258-4. View