» Articles » PMID: 39331869

Comparison of the Value of Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Different Sizes of Thyroid Nodules

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Sep 27
PMID 39331869
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the presence of thyroid nodules of different sizes. We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients with surgically operated unimodular thyroid nodules in Yichang City Central Hospital from July 1, 2021, to April 1, 2023, all of whom underwent conventional thyroid ultrasound, CEUS, and US-FNAB, and all of whom were classified according to the size of nodules into <0.5, 0.5 to 1, and ≥1 cm groups. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the 2 methods for benign and malignant nodules were calculated. Among 110 thyroid nodules, 102 were malignant nodules and 8 were benign nodules. In patients with nodule diameters <1 cm the sensitivity of US-FNAB and CEUS was 87.02% and 93.89%, respectively, and the specificity was 100.00% and 66.67%, with an accuracy of 87.31% and 93.28%, respectively. In patients with nodule diameter <0.5 cm, the sensitivities of US-FNAB and CEUS were 74.29% and 100.00%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); in patients with nodule diameter 0.5 to 1 cm, the sensitivities of US-FNAB and CEUS were 79.59% and 95.92%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); among patients with nodule diameters ≥1 cm, the sensitivities of US-FNAB and CEUS were 88.89% and 77.78%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). For thyroid nodules ≤1 cm in diameter, the sensitivity of CEUS examination was higher than that of US-FNAB; and CEUS still has good diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules <0.5 cm, CEUS is recommended for thyroid nodules diagnosed negatively by US-FNAB with a diameter of <1 cm; and CEUS should be preferred for thyroid nodules with a diameter of <0.5 cm. CEUS should be preferred for thyroid nodules <0.5 cm in diameter.

References
1.
Pedrazzini L, Baroli A, Marzoli L, Guglielmi R, Papini E . Cancer recurrence in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a multivariate analysis on 231 patients with a 12-year follow-up. Minerva Endocrinol. 2013; 38(3):269-79. View

2.
Melany M, Chen S . Thyroid Cancer: Ultrasound Imaging and Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2017; 46(3):691-711. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2017.04.011. View

3.
Xu Y, Xu L, Wang J . Clinical predictors of lymph node metastasis and survival rate in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: analysis of 3607 patients at a single institution. J Surg Res. 2017; 221:128-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.08.007. View

4.
Li F, Luo H . Comparative study of thyroid puncture biopsy guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and conventional ultrasound. Exp Ther Med. 2013; 5(5):1381-1384. PMC: 3671767. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1016. View

5.
Qin J, Zhang S, Li G, Liu S, Shi X, Wu J . [Comparison of the diagnostic value of high frequency ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021; 35(8):718-723. PMC: 10127802. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.08.010. View