» Articles » PMID: 39327949

The Significance of Stent Sizing for Parent Vessel Stenosis After Flow Diversion of MCA Bifurcation Aneurysms

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Sep 27
PMID 39327949
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) present significant therapeutic challenges. Flow-diverter stents have been increasingly adopted for their management, though they may give rise to adverse outcomes such as in-stent stenosis (ISS). This study explores the association between stent oversizing and the incidence of ISS following flow-diverter stent placement in MCA bifurcation aneurysms.

Methods: A retrospective study included 34 patients who underwent flow-diverter stent placement for MCA bifurcation aneurysms between 2020 and 2023. Data on patient demographics, aneurysm morphology, and stent sizing were collected. ISS was evaluated through follow-up imaging at 6-month post-procedure. Stent oversizing was determined by calculating the difference between the stent diameter and the proximal and distal parent vessel diameters. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation and chi-square tests, with significance established at  < 0.05.

Results: The studied group had a mean age of 57.8 years, with 81.6% female patients. The average aneurysm neck size was 3.6 mm, with a mean dome-to-neck ratio of 1.6. ISS was detected in 64.7% of cases proximally and 88.2% distally. A statistically significant negative correlation ( = -0.496,  = 0.003) was observed between stent oversizing and ISS, indicating that increased stent oversizing was associated with a higher incidence of ISS, particularly in the distal vessel segments.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that stent oversizing is significantly associated with the development of ISS in MCA bifurcation aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stents. Careful consideration of stent sizing, particularly minimizing oversizing in distal segments, may mitigate the risk of ISS and improve clinical outcomes. These results underscore the importance of meticulous stent selection and procedural planning in neurointerventional practice.

References
1.
Soydemir E, Gundogmus C, Tureli D, Andac Baltacioglu N, Bayri Y, Baltacioglu F . Safety and efficacy of flow diverter stents in the treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a single-center experience and follow-up data. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023; 29(2):350-358. PMC: 10679704. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2022.211050. View

2.
Gui S, Chen X, Wei D, Deng D, You W, Meng X . Long-term outcomes and dynamic changes of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023; 15(12):1187-1193. PMC: 10715560. DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019680. View

3.
Aguilar Perez M, Bhogal P, Henkes E, Ganslandt O, Bazner H, Henkes H . In-stent Stenosis after p64 Flow Diverter Treatment. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017; 28(4):563-568. PMC: 6245240. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-017-0591-y. View

4.
Brandes R, Fleming I, Busse R . Endothelial aging. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 66(2):286-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.12.027. View

5.
John S, Bain M, Hui F, Hussain M, Masaryk T, Rasmussen P . Long-term Follow-up of In-stent Stenosis After Pipeline Flow Diversion Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2015; 78(6):862-7. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001146. View