» Articles » PMID: 19299567

Effects of Stent Sizing on Endothelial and Vessel Wall Stress: Potential Mechanisms for In-stent Restenosis

Overview
Date 2009 Mar 21
PMID 19299567
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stent sizing and apposition have been shown to be important determinants of clinical outcome. This study evaluates the mechanical effects of undersizing and oversizing of stents on endothelial wall shear stress (WSS) and vessel wall stress to determine a possible biomechanical mechanism of in-stent restenosis and thrombosis. Three-dimensional computational models of stents, artery, and internal fluid were created in a computer-assisted design package, meshed, and solved in finite element and computational fluid dynamic packages. The simulation results show that the effects of various degrees of undersizing on WSS, WSS gradient, and oscillatory shear index were highly nonlinear. As the degree of undersizing increased, the heterogeneity of WSS became smaller. The WSS distribution for the 20% undersizing was smooth and uniform, whereas the 5% case was very heterogeneous. The combination of lower WSS and higher WSS gradient and oscillatory shear index in the 5% undersized case may induce neointimal hyperplasia or thrombosis. Additionally, the oversizing simulation results show that the maximum intramural wall stress of the 20% oversizing case is significantly larger than the maximum stress for the 10% and zero oversizing cases. Edge stress concentration was observed, consistent with the restenosis typically observed in this region. This study demonstrates that proper sizing of stent is important for reducing the hemodynamic and mechanical disturbances to the vessel wall. Furthermore, the present findings may be used to improve stent design to reduce endothelial flow disturbances and intramural wall stress concentrations.

Citing Articles

An increase in flow-diverter oversizing values as an independent risk factor for developing more severe in-stent stenosis. A retrospective single-center study based on flow diversion of supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Vladev G, Sirakov A, Matanov S, Sirakova K, Ninov K, Sirakov S Front Neurol. 2025; 15():1499732.

PMID: 39845941 PMC: 11750651. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1499732.


The significance of stent sizing for parent vessel stenosis after flow diversion of MCA bifurcation aneurysms.

Matanov S, Vladev G, Sirakov A, Ninov K, Penkov M, Tsonev H Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199241285503.

PMID: 39327949 PMC: 11559817. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241285503.


Application of physics-based flow models in cardiovascular medicine: Current practices and challenges.

Vardhan M, Randles A Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 2(1):011302.

PMID: 38505399 PMC: 10903374. DOI: 10.1063/5.0040315.


Literature Survey for In-Vivo Reynolds and Womersley Numbers of Various Arteries and Implications for Compliant In-Vitro Modelling.

Williamson P, Docherty P, Jermy M, Steven B Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024; 15(4):418-430.

PMID: 38499933 PMC: 11319390. DOI: 10.1007/s13239-024-00723-4.


Comparing the Impact of Stenting vs. Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis : A Systematic Review and One-stage and Two-stage Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Yeo J, Yau C, Ong N, Teo Y, Gopinathan A, Yang C Clin Neuroradiol. 2024; 34(2):379-390.

PMID: 38172262 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-023-01370-3.


References
1.
Seo T, Schachter L, Barakat A . Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005; 33(4):444-56. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-005-2499-y. View

2.
Thubrikar M, Baker J, Nolan S . Inhibition of atherosclerosis associated with reduction of arterial intramural stress in rabbits. Arteriosclerosis. 1988; 8(4):410-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.8.4.410. View

3.
Gasser T, Schulze-Bauer C, Holzapfel G . A three-dimensional finite element model for arterial clamping. J Biomech Eng. 2002; 124(4):355-63. DOI: 10.1115/1.1485284. View

4.
White C, Haidekker M, Bao X, Frangos J . Temporal gradients in shear, but not spatial gradients, stimulate endothelial cell proliferation. Circulation. 2001; 103(20):2508-13. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.20.2508. View

5.
Salzar R, Thubrikar M, Eppink R . Pressure-induced mechanical stress in the carotid artery bifurcation: a possible correlation to atherosclerosis. J Biomech. 1995; 28(11):1333-40. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00005-3. View