Understanding Citizens' Attitudes Within User-centered Digital Health Ecosystems: A Sequential Mixed Method Methodology Including a Web-survey

Overview

Journal Digit Health

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2024 Sep 24

PMID 39314816

Authors

Robin Huettemann

Benedict Sevov

Sven Meister

Leonard Fehring

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Transitioning from digital health applications to digital health ecosystems, leveraging the advances in technologies and informatics, could be the next revolution in digital health. This includes offering centralized access to various health services and improving citizens' well-being, delivery, clinical processes, and data management. However, a limited understanding of citizens may impede adaptation. Therefore, this study investigates citizens' attitudes within digital health ecosystems, differentiated by their characteristics, to support health service-providers and governmental policymakers in establishing user-centered solutions.

Methods: This study follows a three-step sequential mixed method methodology: (1) a literature review. (2) Qualitative thematic analyses based on semi-structured qualitative interviews. (3) Quantitative analyses based on a web-survey (descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variances, Tukey-honestly, and Cohen's d tests).

Results: N = 15 citizens were interviewed and n = 1289 responded to the web-survey, to our knowledge the largest survey on this topic. Citizens desire a more convenient management of health services and data (M = 5.2, SD = 1.59). Services with peer-to-peer interactions (M = 3.7, SD = 1.81) and lower involvement of health professionals (M = 3.8, SD = 1.75) are less demanded. Data protection is critical (M = 6.2, SD = 1.23). Public payers are mandated as orchestrators (M = 4.3, SD = 1.99), while private companies receive lower acceptance (M = 3.0, SD = 1.42).

Conclusions: Health service-providers could follow a three-staged approach to establish digital health ecosystems: (1) Increasing the convenience for citizens by enabling online management of health services and data. (2) Extending the citizen-healthcare provider partnership through online interactions. (3) Fostering preventative behaviors and quicker recovery by personalizing health services and interactions. Governmental policymakers should integrate an electronic health record.

References

van Kessel R, Roman-Urrestarazu A, Anderson M, Kyriopoulos I, Field S, Monti G . Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e48000. PMC: 10410406. DOI: 10.2196/48000. View

Broers E, Widdershoven J, Denollet J, Lodder P, Kop W, Wetzels M . Personalized eHealth Program for Life-style Change: Results From the "Do Cardiac Health Advanced New Generated Ecosystem (Do CHANGE 2)" Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychosom Med. 2020; 82(4):409-419. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000802. View

Dehling T, Gao F, Schneider S, Sunyaev A . Exploring the Far Side of Mobile Health: Information Security and Privacy of Mobile Health Apps on iOS and Android. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3(1):e8. PMC: 4319144. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.3672. View

Samad Z, Mahmood S, Siddiqui S, Bhutta Z . Imagining a lean and agile digital health ecosystem - a measure of pandemic responsiveness. J Glob Health. 2020; 10(2):020391. PMC: 7719399. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.020391. View

Floch J, Zettl A, Fricke L, Weisser T, Grut L, Vilarinho T . User Needs in the Development of a Health App Ecosystem for Self-Management of Cystic Fibrosis: User-Centered Development Approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(5):e113. PMC: 5964302. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8236. View

Lee S, Choi M, Yu S, Kim H, Park S, Choi I . Development and evaluation of smartphone usage management system for preventing problematic smartphone use. Digit Health. 2022; 8:20552076221089095. PMC: 8973071. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221089095. View

Mayer G, Hummel S, Oetjen N, Gronewold N, Bubolz S, Blankenhagel K . User experience and acceptance of patients and healthy adults testing a personalized self-management app for depression: A non-randomized mixed-methods feasibility study. Digit Health. 2022; 8:20552076221091353. PMC: 9003643. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221091353. View

Sheikh K, Ghaffar A . PRIMASYS: a health policy and systems research approach for the assessment of country primary health care systems. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021; 19(1):31. PMC: 7936484. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00692-3. View

Noorbergen T, Adam M, Teubner T, Collins C . Using Co-design in Mobile Health System Development: A Qualitative Study With Experts in Co-design and Mobile Health System Development. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021; 9(11):e27896. PMC: 8663505. DOI: 10.2196/27896. View

10.

Rockwern B, Johnson D, Snyder Sulmasy L . Health Information Privacy, Protection, and Use in the Expanding Digital Health Ecosystem: A Position Paper of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2021; 174(7):994-998. DOI: 10.7326/M20-7639. View

11.

Beneteau E, Paradiso A, Pratt W . Telehealth experiences of providers and patients who use augmentative and alternative communication. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021; 29(3):481-488. PMC: 8800527. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab273. View

12.

Sibuyi I, de la Harpe R, Nyasulu P . A Stakeholder-Centered mHealth Implementation Inquiry Within the Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem in South Africa: MomConnect as a Demonstration Case. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(6):e18188. PMC: 9247812. DOI: 10.2196/18188. View

13.

Baumel A, Muench F, Edan S, Kane J . Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(9):e14567. PMC: 6785720. DOI: 10.2196/14567. View

14.

Yousif F, Almulla H, Muhiyaddin R, Althani D, Shah Z, Alam T . Health Informatics Association of Qatar (HIAQ): Building a Digital Health Ecosystem. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020; 272:474-477. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI200598. View

15.

Nunes Vilaza G, Coyle D, Bardram J . Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(10):e31294. PMC: 8590194. DOI: 10.2196/31294. View

16.

Ng K, Tynjala J, Kokko S . Ownership and Use of Commercial Physical Activity Trackers Among Finnish Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(5):e61. PMC: 5438449. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.6940. View

17.

Weik L, Fehring L, Mortsiefer A, Meister S . Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis. NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):47. PMC: 10899241. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01049-0. View

18.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

19.

Mosa A, Yoo I, Sheets L . A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:67. PMC: 3534499. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-67. View

20.

Morley J, Floridi L . The Limits of Empowerment: How to Reframe the Role of mHealth Tools in the Healthcare Ecosystem. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019; 26(3):1159-1183. PMC: 7286867. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00115-1. View