» Articles » PMID: 31573916

Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2019 Oct 2
PMID 31573916
Citations 303
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Understanding patterns of real-world usage of mental health apps is key to maximizing their potential to increase public self-management of care. Although developer-led studies have published results on the use of mental health apps in real-world settings, no study yet has systematically examined usage patterns of a large sample of mental health apps relying on independently collected data.

Objective: Our aim is to present real-world objective data on user engagement with popular mental health apps.

Methods: A systematic engine search was conducted using Google Play to identify Android apps with 10,000 installs or more targeting anxiety, depression, or emotional well-being. Coding of apps included primary incorporated techniques and mental health focus. Behavioral data on real-world usage were obtained from a panel that provides aggregated nonpersonal information on user engagement with mobile apps.

Results: In total, 93 apps met the inclusion criteria (installs: median 100,000, IQR 90,000). The median percentage of daily active users (open rate) was 4.0% (IQR 4.7%) with a difference between trackers (median 6.3%, IQR 10.2%) and peer-support apps (median 17.0%) versus breathing exercise apps (median 1.6%, IQR 1.6%; all z≥3.42, all P<.001). Among active users, daily minutes of use were significantly higher for mindfulness/meditation (median 21.47, IQR 15.00) and peer support (median 35.08, n=2) apps than for apps incorporating other techniques (tracker, breathing exercise, psychoeducation: medians range 3.53-8.32; all z≥2.11, all P<.05). The medians of app 15-day and 30-day retention rates were 3.9% (IQR 10.3%) and 3.3% (IQR 6.2%), respectively. On day 30, peer support (median 8.9%, n=2), mindfulness/meditation (median 4.7%, IQR 6.2%), and tracker apps (median 6.1%, IQR 20.4%) had significantly higher retention rates than breathing exercise apps (median 0.0%, IQR 0.0%; all z≥2.18, all P≤.04). The pattern of daily use presented a descriptive peak toward the evening for apps incorporating most techniques (tracker, psychoeducation, and peer support) except mindfulness/meditation, which exhibited two peaks (morning and night).

Conclusions: Although the number of app installs and daily active minutes of use may seem high, only a small portion of users actually used the apps for a long period of time. More studies using different datasets are needed to understand this phenomenon and the ways in which users self-manage their condition in real-world settings.

Citing Articles

An app to keep: smartphone-based dispatch of community first responder to cardiac arrest.

Marks T, Metelmann B, Brinkrolf P, Thies K, Hahnenkamp K, Metelmann C BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):159.

PMID: 40055589 PMC: 11887373. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04586-y.


Patterns of Skills Review in Smartphone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Observational Study of Intervention Content Use.

Bernstein E, Daniel K, Miyares P, Hoeppner S, Bentley K, Snorrason I JMIR Ment Health. 2025; 12:e63497.

PMID: 39993308 PMC: 11894344. DOI: 10.2196/63497.


Using codesign workshops to develop a conceptual framework for a mobile health app targeting chronic low back pain self-management.

Zhou T, Kirby-Ginns S, Salman D, McGregor A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e093386.

PMID: 39987005 PMC: 11848688. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093386.


Mobile health interventions for active aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of physical activity promotion.

Daniels K, Quadflieg K, Bonnechere B Mhealth. 2025; 11:4.

PMID: 39944853 PMC: 11811652. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-41.


[How to overcome barriers to care with digital health applications (DiGA)? A review of the patient pathway for unipolar depression].

Schneider B, Koerber F, Kreuzenbeck C, Brenner S Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025; 68(3):336-344.

PMID: 39900884 PMC: 11868151. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-04007-z.


References
1.
Anthes E . Mental health: There's an app for that. Nature. 2016; 532(7597):20-3. DOI: 10.1038/532020a. View

2.
Carpenter J, Crutchley P, Zilca R, Schwartz H, Smith L, Cobb A . Seeing the "Big" Picture: Big Data Methods for Exploring Relationships Between Usage, Language, and Outcome in Internet Intervention Data. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(8):e241. PMC: 5023946. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5725. View

3.
Christensen H, Griffiths K, Farrer L . Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11(2):e13. PMC: 2762797. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1194. View

4.
Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine J . Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA. 2004; 291(21):2581-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.21.2581. View

5.
Mohr D, Tomasino K, Lattie E, Palac H, Kwasny M, Weingardt K . IntelliCare: An Eclectic, Skills-Based App Suite for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(1):e10. PMC: 5247623. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6645. View