PRIDASE 2024 Guidelines for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics: Explanation and Elaboration

Overview

Journal Int Endod J

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2024 Sep 19

PMID 39298282

Authors

Maria Pigg

Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu

Henry F Duncan

Paul V Abbott

Ashraf F Fouad

Casper Kruse

Shanon Patel

Dan K Rechenberg

Nandini Suresh

Yedthare Naresh Shetty

Paul M H Dummer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics (PRIDASE) 2024 guidelines are based on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015 guidelines and the Clinical and Laboratory Images in Publications (CLIP) principles, with the addition of items specifically related to endodontics. The use of the PRIDASE 2024 guidelines by authors and their application by journals during the peer review process will reduce the possibility of bias and enhance the quality of future diagnostic accuracy studies. The PRIDASE 2024 guidelines consist of a checklist containing 11 domains and 66 individual items. The purpose of the current document is to provide an explanation for each item on the PRIDASE 2024 checklist, along with examples from the literature to help readers understand their importance and offer advice to those developing manuscripts. A link to the PRIDASE 2024 explanation and elaboration document is available on the Preferred Reporting Items for study Designs in Endodontology (PRIDE) website (https://pride-endodonticguidelines.org/pridase/) and on the International Endodontic Journal website (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/13652591/homepage/pride-guidelines.htm).

Citing Articles

PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration.

Pigg M, Nagendrababu V, Duncan H, Abbott P, Fouad A, Kruse C Int Endod J. 2024; 58(1):6-36.

PMID: 39298282 PMC: 11629046. DOI: 10.1111/iej.14148.

References

El Karim I, Duncan H, Cushley S, Nagendrababu V, Kirkevang L, Kruse C . An international consensus study to identify "what" outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for endodontic treatments (COSET) for utilization in clinical practice and research. Int Endod J. 2024; 57(3):270-280. DOI: 10.1111/iej.14008. View

Davies A, Patel S, Foschi F, Andiappan M, Mitchell P, Mannocci F . The detection of periapical pathoses using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in endodontically retreated teeth - part 2: a 1 year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J. 2015; 49(7):623-35. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12500. View

Khademi A, Saatchi M, Sheikhi M, Soltani M, Moradi S . In Vitro Diagnostic Accuracy and Agreement of Dental Microscope and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Comparison with Microcomputed Tomography for Detection of the Second Mesiobuccal Canal of Maxillary First Molars. Scanning. 2022; 2022:1493153. PMC: 9553662. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1493153. View

Jeong D, Wong S, Karim M, Manges A, Makuza J, Bartlett S . Treatment of HCV with direct-acting antivirals on reducing mortality related to extrahepatic manifestations: a large population-based study in British Columbia, Canada. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024; 29:100658. PMC: 10792760. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100658. View

El Sayed M, Gaballah K . Postanesthetic Cold Sensibility Test as an Indicator for the Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis of Mandibular Molars. Int J Dent. 2021; 2021:9913221. PMC: 8241520. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9913221. View

Hinckfuss K, Sanderson P, Brecknell B, Loeb R, Liu D, Liley H . Evaluating enhanced pulse oximetry auditory displays for neonatal oxygen targeting: A randomized laboratory trial with clinicians and non-clinicians. Appl Ergon. 2022; 107:103918. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103918. View

Lang T, Talerico C, Siontis G . Documenting clinical and laboratory images in publications: the CLIP principles. Chest. 2012; 141(6):1626-1632. DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-1800. View

Dogramaci E, Decurcio D, Chen C, Estrela C, Rossi-Fedele G . Accuracy of periapical and panoramic radiography for detection of root morphologies: a comparative study. Braz Oral Res. 2021; 35:e065. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0065. View

Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S . A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(10):1093-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.014. View

10.

Beacham J, Geist J, Yu Q, Himel V, Sabey K . Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Image Interpretation by Endodontists and Endodontic Residents. J Endod. 2018; 44(4):571-575. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.012. View

11.

Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Reibel J, Wenzel A, Kirkevang L . Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017; 46(7):20170210. PMC: 5988183. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170210. View

12.

Kielbassa A, Muller U, Munz I, Monting J . Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 95(1):94-100. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2003.99. View

13.

Hazard M, Wicker C, Qian F, Williamson A, Teixeira F . Accuracy of cold sensibility testing on teeth with full-coverage restorations: a clinical study. Int Endod J. 2021; 54(7):1008-1015. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13490. View

14.

Virdee S, Bashir N, Krstic M, Camilleri J, Grant M, Cooper P . Periradicular tissue fluid-derived biomarkers for apical periodontitis: An in vitro methodological and in vivo cross-sectional study. Int Endod J. 2023; 56(10):1222-1240. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13956. View

15.

Mertens S, Krois J, Cantu A, Arsiwala L, Schwendicke F . Artificial intelligence for caries detection: Randomized trial. J Dent. 2021; 115:103849. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103849. View

16.

Jonsson Sjogren J, Kvist T, Eliasson A, Pigg M . The frequency and characteristics of pain and discomfort associated with root filled teeth: a practice-based study. Int Endod J. 2019; 52(9):1264-1273. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13124. View

17.

Das S, Das Adhikari H . Reliability of Ultrasonography in differentially diagnosing periapical lesions of endodontic origin in comparison with Intra-oral periapical radiography and Cone-beam computed tomography: An study. J Conserv Dent. 2022; 24(5):445-450. PMC: 8989163. DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_254_21. View

18.

Nagendrababu V, Duncan H, Fouad A, Kirkevang L, Parashos P, Pigg M . PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in Endodontics: A consensus-based development study. Int Endod J. 2022; 56(3):308-317. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13873. View

19.

Dianat O, Nosrat A, Mostoufi B, Price J, Gupta S, Martinho F . Accuracy and efficiency of guided root-end resection using a dynamic navigation system: a human cadaver study. Int Endod J. 2020; 54(5):793-801. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13466. View

20.

Pigg M, Nagendrababu V, Duncan H, Abbott P, Fouad A, Kruse C . PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration. Int Endod J. 2024; 58(1):6-36. PMC: 11629046. DOI: 10.1111/iej.14148. View