» Articles » PMID: 39289313

Real-World Primary Resistance to First-Line Immune-Based Combinations in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (ARON-1)

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic advancements based on immuno-oncology combinations have revolutionized the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma. However, patients who have progressive disease as the best response, "primary refractory" (P), face dismal outcomes.

Objective: Our multicenter retrospective real-world study aims to assess the prevalence and clinicopathological characteristics of P patients.

Methods: This study collected data from 72 centers across 22 countries (1709 patients), involving patients aged ≥18 years with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. All patients were treated with first-line immune-oncology combinations. Data included patient demographics, histology, metastatic sites, and treatment responses. Radiological assessments followed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Statistical analyses employed Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazard models, logistic regression, and the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: In our study, the P rate was 19%. Nivolumab/ipilimumab showed the highest P rate (27%), while pembrolizumab/lenvatinib exhibited the lowest (10%). Primary refactory patients demonstrated significantly lower median overall survival (7.6 months) compared with non-P patients (55.7 months), p < 0.001. At the multivariate analysis, nephrectomy, sarcomatoid de-differentiation, intermediate/poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk, and bone and brain metastases emerged as significant predictors of overall survival for P patients with renal cell carcinoma. Logistic regression showed a significant relationship between liver metastases, intermediate/poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk, and no surgery and an increased risk of P. This study presents limitations, mainly because of its retrospective design.

Conclusions: The ARON-1 study provides valuable insights into P patients, emphasizing the challenges of this precociously resistant subgroup. Identified predictors could guide risk stratification, aiding clinicians in tailored therapeutic approaches.

Citing Articles

Immune-Based and Novel Therapies in Variant Histology Renal Cell Carcinomas.

Miller J, Johnson J, Guske C, Mannam G, Hatoum F, Nassar M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858107 PMC: 11763753. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020326.

References
1.
Siegel R, Miller K, Wagle N, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023; 73(1):17-48. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21763. View

2.
Gulati S, Labaki C, Karachaliou G, Choueiri T, Zhang T . First-Line Treatments for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ever-Enlarging Landscape. Oncologist. 2022; 27(2):125-134. PMC: 8895741. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab056. View

3.
Rini B, Plimack E, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D . Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(12):1116-1127. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714. View

4.
Motzer R, Tannir N, Mcdermott D, Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri T . Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(14):1277-1290. PMC: 5972549. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. View

5.
Choueiri T, Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, Bourlon M, Zurawski B . Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(9):829-841. PMC: 8436591. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026982. View