» Articles » PMID: 39285902

Artificial Intelligence for Geoscience: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives

Abstract

This paper explores the evolution of geoscientific inquiry, tracing the progression from traditional physics-based models to modern data-driven approaches facilitated by significant advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and data collection techniques. Traditional models, which are grounded in physical and numerical frameworks, provide robust explanations by explicitly reconstructing underlying physical processes. However, their limitations in comprehensively capturing Earth's complexities and uncertainties pose challenges in optimization and real-world applicability. In contrast, contemporary data-driven models, particularly those utilizing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), leverage extensive geoscience data to glean insights without requiring exhaustive theoretical knowledge. ML techniques have shown promise in addressing Earth science-related questions. Nevertheless, challenges such as data scarcity, computational demands, data privacy concerns, and the "black-box" nature of AI models hinder their seamless integration into geoscience. The integration of physics-based and data-driven methodologies into hybrid models presents an alternative paradigm. These models, which incorporate domain knowledge to guide AI methodologies, demonstrate enhanced efficiency and performance with reduced training data requirements. This review provides a comprehensive overview of geoscientific research paradigms, emphasizing untapped opportunities at the intersection of advanced AI techniques and geoscience. It examines major methodologies, showcases advances in large-scale models, and discusses the challenges and prospects that will shape the future landscape of AI in geoscience. The paper outlines a dynamic field ripe with possibilities, poised to unlock new understandings of Earth's complexities and further advance geoscience exploration.

Citing Articles

Urban sensing in the era of large language models.

Hou C, Zhang F, Li Y, Li H, Mai G, Kang Y Innovation (Camb). 2025; 6(1):100749.

PMID: 39872478 PMC: 11763892. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100749.


Observational Diagnostics: The Building Block of AI-Powered Visual Aid for Dental Practitioners.

Raj R, Rajappa R, Murthy V, Osanlouy M, Lawrence D, Ganhewa M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851284 PMC: 11759822. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010009.


Artificial intelligence is restructuring a new world.

Xu Y, Wang F, Zhang T Innovation (Camb). 2024; 5(6):100725.

PMID: 39529954 PMC: 11551461. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100725.

References
1.
Zhang X . JWST's eyes on an alien world. Innovation (Camb). 2023; 4(3):100428. PMC: 10189546. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100428. View

2.
Ahmed A, Jui S, Sharma E, Ahmed M, Raj N, Bose A . An advanced deep learning predictive model for air quality index forecasting with remote satellite-derived hydro-climatological variables. Sci Total Environ. 2023; 906:167234. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167234. View

3.
Andersson T, Hosking J, Perez-Ortiz M, Paige B, Elliott A, Russell C . Seasonal Arctic sea ice forecasting with probabilistic deep learning. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):5124. PMC: 8390499. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25257-4. View

4.
Flecker A, Shi Q, Almeida R, Angarita H, Gomes-Selman J, Garcia-Villacorta R . Reducing adverse impacts of Amazon hydropower expansion. Science. 2022; 375(6582):753-760. DOI: 10.1126/science.abj4017. View

5.
Zheng Y . Mars Exploration in 2020. Innovation (Camb). 2020; 1(2):100036. PMC: 7409935. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100036. View