» Articles » PMID: 27035946

Discovering Governing Equations from Data by Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Apr 2
PMID 27035946
Citations 286
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extracting governing equations from data is a central challenge in many diverse areas of science and engineering. Data are abundant whereas models often remain elusive, as in climate science, neuroscience, ecology, finance, and epidemiology, to name only a few examples. In this work, we combine sparsity-promoting techniques and machine learning with nonlinear dynamical systems to discover governing equations from noisy measurement data. The only assumption about the structure of the model is that there are only a few important terms that govern the dynamics, so that the equations are sparse in the space of possible functions; this assumption holds for many physical systems in an appropriate basis. In particular, we use sparse regression to determine the fewest terms in the dynamic governing equations required to accurately represent the data. This results in parsimonious models that balance accuracy with model complexity to avoid overfitting. We demonstrate the algorithm on a wide range of problems, from simple canonical systems, including linear and nonlinear oscillators and the chaotic Lorenz system, to the fluid vortex shedding behind an obstacle. The fluid example illustrates the ability of this method to discover the underlying dynamics of a system that took experts in the community nearly 30 years to resolve. We also show that this method generalizes to parameterized systems and systems that are time-varying or have external forcing.

Citing Articles

Data-driven ergonomic risk assessment of complex hand-intensive manufacturing processes.

Krishnan A, Yang X, Seth U, Jeyachandran J, Ahn J, Gardner R Commun Eng. 2025; 4(1):45.

PMID: 40075152 PMC: 11903948. DOI: 10.1038/s44172-025-00382-w.


Inference of a three-gene network underpinning epidermal stem cell development in .

Brozek A, Ceccarelli A, Solvsten Jorgensen A, Hintze M, Shahrezaei V, Barkoulas M iScience. 2025; 28(2):111826.

PMID: 39995855 PMC: 11848479. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111826.


TiDHy: Timescale Demixing via Hypernetworks to learn simultaneous dynamics from mixed observations.

Abe E, Brunton B bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974964 PMC: 11838317. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.28.635316.


Comparison of derivative-based and correlation-based methods to estimate effective connectivity in neural networks.

Laasch N, Braun W, Knoff L, Bielecki J, Hilgetag C Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5357.

PMID: 39948086 PMC: 11825726. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88596-y.


Derivative-Free Domain-Informed Data-Driven Discovery of Sparse Kinetic Models.

Prabhu S, Kosir N, Kothare M, Rangarajan S Ind Eng Chem Res. 2025; 64(5):2601-2615.

PMID: 39926438 PMC: 11803628. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02981.


References
1.
Jordan M, Mitchell T . Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science. 2015; 349(6245):255-60. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa8415. View

2.
Schmidt M, Lipson H . Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science. 2009; 324(5923):81-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1165893. View

3.
Ozolins V, Lai R, Caflisch R, Osher S . Compressed modes for variational problems in mathematics and physics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(46):18368-73. PMC: 3831964. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318679110. View

4.
Bongard J, Lipson H . Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(24):9943-8. PMC: 1891254. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609476104. View

5.
Schmidt M, Vallabhajosyula R, Jenkins J, Hood J, Soni A, Wikswo J . Automated refinement and inference of analytical models for metabolic networks. Phys Biol. 2011; 8(5):055011. PMC: 4109817. DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/5/055011. View