» Articles » PMID: 39266729

Exerting Force at the Maximal Speed Drives the Increase in Power Output in Elite Athletes After 4 weeks of Resistance Training

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2024 Sep 12
PMID 39266729
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In the present study, we examined how a 4-week intervention of maximal intended velocity (MIVRT) and controlled velocity resistance training (CRT)-induced task-specific responses in expert individuals.

Methods: Twenty elite athletes were randomly assigned to either a MIVRT (n = 10) or CRT (n = 10) group, both following the same volume-load training based on the back-squat three times a week but with different intentions in moving load (force-exertion speed). We assessed one-repetition maximum (1RM), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and mean propulsive power (MPP) using a progressive-loading test before and after the intervention. A linear position transducer was used to monitor propulsive velocity in training and testing sessions.

Results: Both groups significantly increased their 1RM (CRT: + 12.3%, p < 0.001, d = 0.39; MIVRT: + 12.5%, p < 0.001, d = 0.45). Only the MIVRT group showed a significant improvement in MPV (p < 0.01) across different stepping loads, while both groups improved in MPP (MIVRT: + 22.4%, p < 0.001, d = 0.54; CRT: + 8.1%, p = 0.04, d = 0.17).

Conclusions: MIVRT induced significant adaptations in MPV and MPP at various loads (%1RM), underlining its specificity in targeting these parameters. Despite similar enhancements in 1RM, the distinct training protocols suggest that strength gains may stem from either maximal intent in moving loads or longer times under tension. This study highlights the role of execution speed in optimizing power outcomes, emphasizing task specificity as paramount to elicit physiological adaptations in chronically strength-trained individuals.

Citing Articles

Higher dominant muscle strength is mediated by motor unit discharge rates and proportion of common synaptic inputs.

Lecce E, Del Vecchio A, Nuccio S, Felici F, Bazzucchi I Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8269.

PMID: 40065078 PMC: 11894131. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92737-8.


Cross-education: motor unit adaptations mediate the strength increase in non-trained muscles following 8 weeks of unilateral resistance training.

Lecce E, Conti A, Del Vecchio A, Felici F, Scotto di Palumbo A, Sacchetti M Front Physiol. 2025; 15:1512309.

PMID: 39839528 PMC: 11747592. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1512309.

References
1.
Aagaard P, Simonsen E, Andersen J, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P . Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002; 93(4):1318-26. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2002. View

2.
Balshaw T, Massey G, Maden-Wilkinson T, Morales-Artacho A, McKeown A, Appleby C . Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017; 117(4):631-640. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3560-x. View

3.
Bandy W, Lovelace-Chandler V, McKitrick-Bandy B . Adaptation of skeletal muscle to resistance training. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990; 12(6):248-55. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1990.12.6.248. View

4.
Behm D, Sale D . Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993; 74(1):359-68. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.1.359. View

5.
Burd N, Andrews R, West D, Little J, Cochran A, Hector A . Muscle time under tension during resistance exercise stimulates differential muscle protein sub-fractional synthetic responses in men. J Physiol. 2011; 590(2):351-62. PMC: 3285070. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.221200. View