» Articles » PMID: 39264543

Post-contrast Acute Kidney Injury in the Super-elder Patients: a CT-scan Perspective

Overview
Journal Jpn J Radiol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Sep 12
PMID 39264543
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The administration of intravenous (IV) contrast media during computed tomography (CT) examinations is essential to enhance diagnostic accuracy in various clinical scenarios. Traditionally, older age is considered a risk factor for the development of post-contrast Acute Kidney Injury (PC-AKI); however, there is limited information available for the super-elderly population (aged ≥ 85). This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with PC-AKI in individuals aged 85 and older undergoing CT scans with IV contrast.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study, including all hospitalized patients aged 85 or older who underwent CT scans between the years 2005 and 2021. Patients were categorized into IV contrast and non-IV contrast groups. Baseline demographic and clinical data, along with kidney function parameters, were collected.

Results: The final cohort included 7,078 patients who underwent CT scans, with 40% receiving IV contrast. The overall AKI occurrence within 72 h post-CT was 5.72%, slightly elevated in the non-IV contrast group (6.25% vs. 4.94%, p = 0.02). However, multivariate analysis revealed no significant difference between the groups (OR 1, CI 0.8-1.2, p = 0.92), even after stratifying by kidney function. A secondary analysis, using a less strict AKI definition, supported these findings. Baseline creatinine levels emerged as prominent risk factor associated with PC- AKI.

Conclusion: The current study provides reassurance regarding the safety of contrast-enhanced CT scans in super-elderly patients, particularly those with baseline normal to mild kidney dysfunction. These findings may contribute to the ongoing discussion on the risk-benefit balance of contrast-enhanced CT scans in the super-elderly population.

References
1.
Seidel J, Bissell M, Vatturi S, Hartery A . Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Computed Tomography Imaging Utilization at an Academic Centre: An Analysis of Clinical Indications and Outcomes. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019; 70(1):13-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.10.004. View

2.
Pandharipande P, Alabre C, Coy D, Zaheer A, Miller C, Herring M . Changes in Physician Decision Making after CT: A Prospective Multicenter Study in Primary Care Settings. Radiology. 2016; 281(3):835-846. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152887. View

3.
Parillo M, van der Molen A, Asbach P, Elsholtz F, Laghi A, Ronot M . The role of iodinated contrast media in computed tomography structured Reporting and Data Systems (RADS): a narrative review. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(11):7621-7631. PMC: 10644138. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-603. View

4.
Tsushima Y, Yamada S, Aoki J, Motojima T, Endo K . Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults. Clin Radiol. 2002; 57(6):507-13. DOI: 10.1053/crad.2001.0925. View

5.
Bae K . Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010; 256(1):32-61. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10090908. View