» Articles » PMID: 39252454

Implementation Challenges of Electronic Blood Transfusion Safety Systems: Lessons from an International, Multi-site Comparative Case Study

Overview
Journal Transfus Med
Specialty Hematology
Date 2024 Sep 10
PMID 39252454
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Severe transfusion reactions resulting from errors in matching the correct blood with the correct patient are considered never events. Despite the relative technical simplicity of barcode scanning for patient-blood bag matching, the adoption and universal application of this safety measure are by no means universal. This study highlights the logistical and institutional challenges associated with spreading, scaling up, and sustaining such IT-supported safety measures in healthcare.

Study Design And Methods: We report findings from a 5-year, prospective, multi-site case study conducted across one hospital in England and three hospitals in the Netherlands. Ethnographic methods, including interviews and observations, were used at each site to investigate the implementation of barcode scanning-supported safety pathways for blood transfusions.

Results: Significant variation was observed across the sites in the adoption and implementation of barcode scanning-supported safety pathways. Despite the potential for reducing transfusion errors, the introduction of this innovation was met with varying levels of success in different settings.

Discussion: This study highlights the critical role of inter-hospital learning and flexible system design in successfully implementing barcode scanning-supported safety pathways for blood transfusions. A more structured, national-level network for knowledge sharing could enhance the spread and sustainability of such innovations across healthcare settings.

Citing Articles

Implementation challenges of electronic blood transfusion safety systems: Lessons from an international, multi-site comparative case study.

Horck S, Fahy N, Greenhalgh T Transfus Med. 2024; 35(1):48-59.

PMID: 39252454 PMC: 11833216. DOI: 10.1111/tme.13095.

References
1.
Ohsaka A, Kobayashi M, Abe K . Causes of failure of a barcode-based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital. Transfus Med. 2008; 18(4):216-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2008.00868.x. View

2.
Jones J, Ashford P, Asher D, Barker J, Lodge L, Rowley M . Guidelines for the specification, implementation and management of information technology systems in hospital transfusion laboratories. Transfus Med. 2014; 24(6):341-71. DOI: 10.1111/tme.12159. View

3.
Jensen N, Crosson J . An automated system for bedside verification of the match between patient identification and blood unit identification. Transfusion. 1996; 36(3):216-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36396182138.x. View

4.
Turner C, Casbard A, Murphy M . Barcode technology: its role in increasing the safety of blood transfusion. Transfusion. 2003; 43(9):1200-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00428.x. View

5.
Hibbs S, Noel S, Miles D, Staves J, Murphy M . The impact of electronic decision support and electronic remote blood issue on transfusion practice. Transfus Med. 2014; 24(5):274-9. DOI: 10.1111/tme.12149. View