Influence of Sea Ice Concentration, Sex and Chick Age on Foraging Flexibility and Success in an Arctic Seabird

Overview

Journal Conserv Physiol

Date 2024 Sep 9

PMID 39247178

Authors

Alyssa Eby

Allison Patterson

Shannon Whelan

Kyle H Elliott

H Grant Gilchrist

Oliver P Love

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Declining sea ice and increased variability in sea ice dynamics are altering Arctic marine food webs. Changes in sea ice dynamics and prey availability are likely to impact pagophilic (ice-dependent and ice-associated) species, such as thick-billed murres (), through changes in foraging behaviour and foraging success. At the same time, extrinsic factors, such as chick demand, and intrinsic factors, such as sex, are also likely to influence foraging behaviour and foraging success of adult murres. Here, we use 3 years of data (2017-2019) to examine the impacts of environmental conditions (sea ice concentration and sea surface temperature), sex and chick age (as a proxy for chick demand) on foraging and diving behaviour (measured via biologgers), energy expenditure (estimated from activity budgets) and foraging success (measured via nutritional biomarkers) of thick-billed murres during the incubation and chick-rearing stages at Coats Island, Nunavut. Murres only exhibited foraging flexibility to environmental conditions during incubation, which is also the only stage when ice was present. When more ice was present, foraging effort increased, murres foraged farther and made deeper dives, where murres making deeper dives had higher foraging success (greater relative change in mass). During incubation, murre behaviour was also influenced by sex of the individual, where males made more and shorter trips and more dives. During chick-rearing, murre behaviour was influenced primarily by the sex of the individual and chick age. Males made shallower dives and fewer dive bouts per day, and more dives. Birds made longer, deeper dives as chicks aged, likely representing increased intra-specific competition for prey throughout the season. Our results suggest variation in sea ice concentration does impact foraging success of murres; however, sex-specific foraging strategies may help buffer colony breeding success from variability in sea ice concentration.

Citing Articles

Influence of sea ice concentration, sex and chick age on foraging flexibility and success in an Arctic seabird.

Eby A, Patterson A, Whelan S, Elliott K, Gilchrist H, Love O Conserv Physiol. 2024; 12(1):coae057.

PMID: 39247178 PMC: 11381092. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coae057.

References

Jackson L, Leandri-Breton D, Whelan S, Turmaine A, Hatch S, Gremillet D . Beyond body condition: Experimental evidence that plasma metabolites improve nutritional state measurements in a free-living seabird. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2023; 285:111504. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2023.111504. View

McEwen B, Wingfield J . The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm Behav. 2003; 43(1):2-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0018-506x(02)00024-7. View

Morales A, Frei B, Leung C, Titman R, Whelan S, Morgan Benowitz-Fredericks Z . Point-of-care blood analyzers measure the nutritional state of eighteen free-living bird species. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2019; 240:110594. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.110594. View

Linnebjerg J, Fort J, Guilford T, Reuleaux A, Mosbech A, Frederiksen M . Sympatric breeding auks shift between dietary and spatial resource partitioning across the annual cycle. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e72987. PMC: 3758292. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072987. View

Patterson A, Gilchrist H, Robertson G, Hedd A, Fifield D, Elliott K . Behavioural flexibility in an Arctic seabird using two distinct marine habitats to survive the energetic constraints of winter. Mov Ecol. 2022; 10(1):45. PMC: 9635182. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-022-00344-3. View

Eby A, Patterson A, Sorenson G, Lazarus T, Whelan S, Elliott K . Lower nutritional state and foraging success in an Arctic seabird despite behaviorally flexible responses to environmental change. Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(4):e9923. PMC: 10119025. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9923. View

Jeanniard du Dot T, Rosen D, Richmond J, Kitaysky A, Zinn S, Trites A . Changes in glucocorticoids, IGF-I and thyroid hormones as indicators of nutritional stress and subsequent refeeding in Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009; 152(4):524-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.12.010. View

St John Glew K, Wanless S, Harris M, Daunt F, Erikstad K, Strom H . Sympatric Atlantic puffins and razorbills show contrasting responses to adverse marine conditions during winter foraging within the North Sea. Mov Ecol. 2019; 7:33. PMC: 6824136. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-019-0174-4. View

Norberg R . To minimize foraging time, use high-efficiency, energy-expensive search and capture methods when food is abundant but low-efficiency, low-cost methods during food shortages. Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(23):16537-16546. PMC: 8668745. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8204. View

10.

Darden S, Croft D . Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes. Biol Lett. 2008; 4(5):449-51. PMC: 2610095. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0308. View

11.

Shoji A, Aris-Brosou S, Fayet A, Padget O, Perrins C, Guilford T . Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model. J Exp Biol. 2015; 218(Pt 13):2116-23. PMC: 4510841. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.120626. View

12.

Bonnet-Lebrun A, Larsen T, Frederiksen M, Fox D, le Bouard F, Boutet A . Effects of competitive pressure and habitat heterogeneity on niche partitioning between Arctic and boreal congeners. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22133. PMC: 8586341. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01506-w. View

13.

Elliott K, Ricklefs R, Gaston A, Hatch S, Speakman J, Davoren G . High flight costs, but low dive costs, in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(23):9380-4. PMC: 3677478. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304838110. View

14.

Eby A, Patterson A, Whelan S, Elliott K, Gilchrist H, Love O . Influence of sea ice concentration, sex and chick age on foraging flexibility and success in an Arctic seabird. Conserv Physiol. 2024; 12(1):coae057. PMC: 11381092. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coae057. View

15.

Madliger C, Love O, Hultine K, Cooke S . The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities. Conserv Physiol. 2018; 6(1):coy029. PMC: 6007632. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coy029. View

16.

Patterson A, Gilchrist H, Chivers L, Hatch S, Elliott K . A comparison of techniques for classifying behavior from accelerometers for two species of seabird. Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(6):3030-3045. PMC: 6434605. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4740. View

17.

Cherel Y, Robin J, Walch O, Karmann H, Netchitailo P, Le Maho Y . Fasting in king penguin. I. Hormonal and metabolic changes during breeding. Am J Physiol. 1988; 254(2 Pt 2):R170-7. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1988.254.2.R170. View

18.

Storey A, Ryan M, Fitzsimmons M, Kouwenberg A, Takahashi L, Robertson G . Balancing personal maintenance with parental investment in a chick-rearing seabird: physiological indicators change with foraging conditions. Conserv Physiol. 2017; 5(1):cox055. PMC: 5622326. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cox055. View

19.

Jacobs S, Edwards D, Ringrose J, Elliott K, Weber J, Gaston A . Changes in body composition during breeding: Reproductive strategies of three species of seabirds under poor environmental conditions. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 158(1):77-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2010.09.011. View

20.

Huffeldt N, Merkel F . Sex-specific, inverted rhythms of breeding-site attendance in an Arctic seabird. Biol Lett. 2016; 12(9). PMC: 5046920. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0289. View