» Articles » PMID: 39242877

Fluid Bolus Increases Plasma Hyaluronan Concentration Compared to Follow-up Strategy Without a Bolus in Oliguric Intensive Care Unit Patients

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Sep 6
PMID 39242877
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fluid therapy is a fundamental part of supportive therapy in critical care. However, it is also a suspected risk for endothelial glycocalyx degradation which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This secondary analysis of RESPONSE randomized trial compares the effect of follow-up strategy (FU) on endothelial biomarkers to that of 500 ml crystalloid fluid bolus (FB) in oliguric, hemodynamically optimized intensive care unit (ICU) patients. 130 adult subjects were enrolled in two Finnish ICUs from January 2017 to November 2020. Blood and urine samples of 63 patients in FU group and 67 patients in FB group were collected before and after the intervention and analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Single fluid bolus, given after median of 3887 ml (interquartile range 2842; 5359 ml) resuscitation fluids in the preceding 24 h, increased plasma hyaluronan concentration compared to the follow-up strategy (difference in medians 29.2 ng/ml with 95% CI [14.5ng/ml; 55.5ng/ml], P < 0.001). No treatment effect was detected in the plasma levels of syndecan-1, , angiopoietin-2, angiopoietin receptors Tie2 and Tie1, or in soluble thrombomodulin in the adjusted median regression analysis. The increase in hyaluronan was independent of its simultaneous renal clearance but correlated moderately with the increase in endothelium-specific Tie1. The follow-up strategy did not show consistent endothelium-sparing effect but protected against hyaluronan increase. The mechanisms and consequences of hyaluronan fluctuations need further clarification. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02860572. Registered 1 August 2016, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02860572?term=NCT02860572&rank=1.

References
1.
Bol M, Huckriede J, van de Pas K, Delhaas T, Lorusso R, Nicolaes G . Multimodal measurement of glycocalyx degradation during coronary artery bypass grafting. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:1045728. PMC: 9744810. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1045728. View

2.
Calfee C, Gallagher D, Abbott J, Thompson B, Matthay M . Plasma angiopoietin-2 in clinical acute lung injury: prognostic and pathogenetic significance. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40(6):1731-7. PMC: 3601049. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c87. View

3.
Messina A, Bakker J, Chew M, De Backer D, Hamzaoui O, Hernandez G . Pathophysiology of fluid administration in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022; 10(1):46. PMC: 9633880. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-022-00473-4. View

4.
Drost C, Rovas A, Kusche-Vihrog K, van Slyke P, Kim H, Hoang V . Tie2 Activation Promotes Protection and Reconstitution of the Endothelial Glycocalyx in Human Sepsis. Thromb Haemost. 2019; 119(11):1827-1838. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695768. View

5.
Sun T, Wang Y, Wu X, Cai Y, Zhai T, Zhan Q . Prognostic Value of Syndecan-1 in the Prediction of Sepsis-Related Complications and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:870065. PMC: 9035829. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870065. View