Guide Assignment in Single-cell CRISPR Screens Using Crispat

Overview

Journal Bioinformatics

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Sep 6

PMID 39240651

Authors

Jana M Braunger

Britta Velten

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Motivation: Pooled single-cell CRISPR screens have emerged as a powerful tool in functional genomics to probe the effect of genetic interventions at scale. A crucial step in the analysis of the resulting data is the assignment of cells to gRNAs corresponding to a specific genetic intervention. However, this step is challenging due to a lack of systematic benchmarks and accessible software to apply and compare different guide assignment strategies. To address this, we here propose crispat (CRISPR guide assignment tool), a Python package to facilitate the choice of a suitable guide assignment strategy for single-cell CRISPR screens.

Results: We demonstrate the package on four single-cell CRISPR interference screens at low multiplicity of infection from two studies, where crispat identifies strong differences in the number of assigned cells, downregulation of the target genes and number of discoveries across different guide assignment strategies, highlighting the need for a suitable guide assignment strategy to obtain optimal power in single-cell CRISPR screens.

Availability And Implementation: crispat is implemented in python, the source code, installation instructions and tutorials can be found at https://github.com/velten-group/crispat and it can be installed from PyPI (https://pypi.org/project/crispat/). Code to reproduce all findings in this paper is available at https://github.com/velten-group/crispat_analysis, as well as at https://zenodo.org/records/13373265.

References

Replogle J, Saunders R, Pogson A, Hussmann J, Lenail A, Guna A . Mapping information-rich genotype-phenotype landscapes with genome-scale Perturb-seq. Cell. 2022; 185(14):2559-2575.e28. PMC: 9380471. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.013. View

Zhou Y, Luo K, Liang L, Chen M, He X . A new Bayesian factor analysis method improves detection of genes and biological processes affected by perturbations in single-cell CRISPR screening. Nat Methods. 2023; 20(11):1693-1703. PMC: 10630124. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-02017-4. View

Wolf F, Angerer P, Theis F . SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018; 19(1):15. PMC: 5802054. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0. View

Bock C, Datlinger P, Chardon F, Coelho M, Dong M, Lawson K . High-content CRISPR screening. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2023; 2(1). PMC: 10200264. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-022-00098-7. View

Barry T, Roeder K, Katsevich E . Exponential family measurement error models for single-cell CRISPR screens. Biostatistics. 2024; 25(4):1254-1272. PMC: 11471999. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxae010. View

Schraivogel D, Gschwind A, Milbank J, Leonce D, Jakob P, Mathur L . Targeted Perturb-seq enables genome-scale genetic screens in single cells. Nat Methods. 2020; 17(6):629-635. PMC: 7610614. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0837-5. View

Adamson B, Norman T, Jost M, Cho M, Nunez J, Chen Y . A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell. 2016; 167(7):1867-1882.e21. PMC: 5315571. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048. View

Melsted P, Booeshaghi A, Liu L, Gao F, Lu L, Min K . Modular, efficient and constant-memory single-cell RNA-seq preprocessing. Nat Biotechnol. 2021; 39(7):813-818. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00870-2. View

Barry T, Mason K, Roeder K, Katsevich E . Robust differential expression testing for single-cell CRISPR screens at low multiplicity of infection. Genome Biol. 2024; 25(1):124. PMC: 11100084. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03254-2. View

10.

Zheng G, Terry J, Belgrader P, Ryvkin P, Bent Z, Wilson R . Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:14049. PMC: 5241818. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14049. View

11.

Schraivogel D, Steinmetz L, Parts L . Pooled Genome-Scale CRISPR Screens in Single Cells. Annu Rev Genet. 2023; 57:223-244. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-072920-013842. View

12.

Datlinger P, Rendeiro A, Schmidl C, Krausgruber T, Traxler P, Klughammer J . Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(3):297-301. PMC: 5334791. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4177. View

13.

Dixit A, Parnas O, Li B, Chen J, Fulco C, Jerby-Arnon L . Perturb-Seq: Dissecting Molecular Circuits with Scalable Single-Cell RNA Profiling of Pooled Genetic Screens. Cell. 2016; 167(7):1853-1866.e17. PMC: 5181115. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.038. View

14.

Papalexi E, Mimitou E, Butler A, Foster S, Bracken B, Mauck 3rd W . Characterizing the molecular regulation of inhibitory immune checkpoints with multimodal single-cell screens. Nat Genet. 2021; 53(3):322-331. PMC: 8011839. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00778-2. View

15.

Yu Q, Van Minsel P, Galle E, Thienpont B . GiRAFR improves gRNA detection and annotation in single-cell CRISPR screens. Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):975. PMC: 10518011. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05351-7. View

16.

Cheng J, Lin G, Wang T, Wang Y, Guo W, Liao J . Massively Parallel CRISPR-Based Genetic Perturbation Screening at Single-Cell Resolution. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022; 10(4):e2204484. PMC: 9896079. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202204484. View

17.

Frangieh C, Melms J, Thakore P, Geiger-Schuller K, Ho P, Luoma A . Multimodal pooled Perturb-CITE-seq screens in patient models define mechanisms of cancer immune evasion. Nat Genet. 2021; 53(3):332-341. PMC: 8376399. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00779-1. View

18.

Hao Y, Stuart T, Kowalski M, Choudhary S, Hoffman P, Hartman A . Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2023; 42(2):293-304. PMC: 10928517. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y. View

19.

Duan B, Zhou C, Zhu C, Yu Y, Li G, Zhang S . Model-based understanding of single-cell CRISPR screening. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):2233. PMC: 6527552. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10216-x. View