» Articles » PMID: 39238871

Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Response to Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection at 3 Months: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Interv Pain Med
Date 2024 Sep 6
PMID 39238871
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is commonly used to relieve pain due to intervertebral disc displacements (IDD). Poorly defined selection criteria lead to post procedure dissatisfaction among patients. We aimed to find clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predictors for pain relief at 3 months following a TFESI. Poorly defined selection criteria lead to post procedure dissatisfaction among patients.

Methods: A retrospective study of 116 patients who had undergone TFESI. Predictors used were - age, duration of symptoms, body mass index, neuropathic character of pain, dermatomal distribution of pain, claudication distance, response to anti-neuropathic medication and extent of nerve root compromise in MRI as per Pfirmann criteria. A relief of 50% or more at the end of 3 months was considered the criterion for significant pain relief from TFESI.

Results: At 3 months, 72% (84/116) had significant pain relief. Dermatomal distribution of pain (73%) and neurogenic claudication (71%) were the most prevalent clinical features. Dermatomal distribution of leg pain, responsiveness to anti-neuropathic medications and a Pfirmann grade 2/3 in MRI were the most important predictors with an odds ratio (OR) of 12.1,  ​< ​0.001, OR 6.4,  ​= ​0.002 and OR 3.1,  ​= ​0.056, respectively. The model was statistically significant χ (3, N ​= ​116) ​= ​43.43, 0.001 and explained 52% variance in the outcome. The model correctly predicted the outcome 85% times.

Conclusions: If a patient has leg pain which is dermatomal in distribution, responds to anti-neuropathic medications and has Pfirmann grade 2/3 in MRI, then chances of more than 50% relief persisting at 3 months after TFESI are significantly better.

Citing Articles

Comparing the clinical efficacy of preganglionic and preganglionic plus ganglionic transforaminal epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain.

Goksu H, Celik S, Akcaboy E, Sahin S, Baran M, Yildiz G Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2025; 30(1):44-48.

PMID: 39800417 PMC: 11753591. DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2025.1.20240064.

References
1.
Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, Clark J, Smeets R, Malfliet A . Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015; 18(3):E333-46. View

2.
Ekedahl H, Jonsson B, Annertz M, Frobell R . The 1-Year Results of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients with Chronic Unilateral Radicular Pain: The Relation to MRI Findings and Clinical Features. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96(9):654-662. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000730. View

3.
Jain A, Agarwal A, Jain S, Waindeskar V . Comparison Between a Single Subpedicular Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection and Lateral Recess Steroid Injection in Reducing Paracentral Disc Herniation-Related Chronic Neuropathic Leg Pain: A Retrospective Study. World Neurosurg. 2021; 149:e392-e399. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.011. View

4.
Lurie J, Tosteson T, Tosteson A, Zhao W, Morgan T, Abdu W . Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 39(1):3-16. PMC: 3921966. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000088. View

5.
Park D, Kang S, Park J . Factors Predicting Favorable Short-Term Response to Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(5). PMC: 6571939. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55050162. View