» Articles » PMID: 31109045

Factors Predicting Favorable Short-Term Response to Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 May 22
PMID 31109045
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify predictors of short-term outcomes associated with a lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The medical records of 218 patients, who were diagnosed with lumbosacral radiculopathy and treated with a TFESI, were reviewed in this retrospective study. A mixture of corticosteroid, lidocaine, and hyaluronidase was injected during TFESI. Patients with >50% pain relief on the numerical rating scale compared with the initial visit constituted the good responder group. Demographic, clinical, MRI, and electrodiagnostic data were collected to assess the predictive factors for short-term outcomes of the TFESI. A multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a shorter duration of symptoms and a positive sharp wave (PSW)/fibrillation (Fib) observed in electrodiagnostic study (EDx) increased the odds of significant improvement 2-4 weeks after the TFESI. Shorter duration of symptoms and PSW/Fib on EDx were predictors of favorable short-term response to TFESI.

Citing Articles

The role of psychosocial factors in mediating the treatment response of epidural steroid injections for low back pain with or without lumbosacral radiculopathy: A scoping review.

Stensland M, McGeary D, Covell C, Fitzgerald E, Mojallal M, Lugosi S PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316366.

PMID: 39813271 PMC: 11734955. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316366.


Clinical and radiological predictors of response to lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection at 3 months: A retrospective study.

Jain A, Jain S, Barasker S, Trivedi S, Gupta E, Kaushal A Interv Pain Med. 2024; 1(4):100159.

PMID: 39238871 PMC: 11373067. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100159.


Electromyography and Therapeutic Response to Lumbosacral Epidural Steroid Injections: A Systematic Review.

Meiling J, Moman R, Pagan-Rosado R, Kinzelman-Vesely E, Hunt C, Hooten W J Pain Res. 2021; 14:2851-2858.

PMID: 34539187 PMC: 8445100. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S327504.


Effect of supraneural transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with caudal epidural steroid injection with catheter in chronic radicular pain management: Double blinded randomized controlled trial.

Munjupong S, Kumnerddee W F1000Res. 2020; 9:634.

PMID: 32695314 PMC: 7344176. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.23188.2.

References
1.
Manchikanti L, Bakhit C, Pakanati R, Fellows B . Fluoroscopy is medically necessary for the performance of epidural steroids. Anesth Analg. 1999; 89(5):1330-1. View

2.
Pfirrmann C, Oberholzer P, Zanetti M, Boos N, Trudell D, Resnick D . Selective nerve root blocks for the treatment of sciatica: evaluation of injection site and effectiveness--a study with patients and cadavers. Radiology. 2001; 221(3):704-11. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2213001635. View

3.
Tong H, Williams J, Haig A, Geisser M, Chiodo A . Predicting outcomes of transforaminal epidural injections for sciatica. Spine J. 2003; 3(6):430-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00179-7. View

4.
Wickstrom G, Hanninen K, Lehtinen M, Riihimaki H . Previous back syndromes and present back symptoms in concrete reinforecment workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1978; 4 Suppl 1:20-9. View

5.
Inman S, Faut-Callahan M, Swanson B, Fillingim R . Sex differences in responses to epidural steroid injection for low back pain. J Pain. 2004; 5(8):450-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.07.004. View