» Articles » PMID: 39230454

Expanding Theory, Methodology and Empirical Systems at the Spatial-social Interface

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Sep 4
PMID 39230454
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

All animals exhibit some combination of spatial and social behaviours. A diversity of interactions occurs between such behaviours, producing emergent phenomena at . Untangling and interrogating these complex, intertwined processes can be vital for identifying the mechanisms, causes and consequences of behavioural variation in animal ecology. Nevertheless, the integrated study of the interactions between spatial and social phenotypes and environments (at the spatial-social interface) is in its relative infancy. In this theme issue, we present a collection of papers chosen to expand the spatial-social interface along several theoretical, methodological and empirical dimensions. They detail new perspectives, methods, study systems and more, as well as offering roadmaps for applied outputs and detailing exciting new directions for the field to move in the future. In this Introduction, we outline the contents of these papers, placing them in the context of what comes before, and we synthesize a number of takeaways and future directions for the spatial-social interface. This article is part of the theme issue 'The spatial-social interface: a theoretical and empirical integration'.

Citing Articles

How do non-independent host movements affect spatio-temporal disease dynamics? Partitioning the contributions of spatial overlap and correlated movements to transmission risk.

Vargas Soto J, Kosiewska J, Grove D, Metts D, Muller L, Wilber M Mov Ecol. 2025; 13(1):11.

PMID: 40012019 PMC: 11866778. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-025-00539-4.


Faithful pals and familiar locales: differentiating social and spatial site fidelity during reproduction.

Hendrix J, Robitaille A, Kusch J, Webber Q, Vander Wal E Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1912):20220525.

PMID: 39230451 PMC: 11449207. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0525.

References
1.
Merkle J, Poulin M, Caldwell M, Laforge M, Scholle A, Verzuh T . Spatial-social familiarity complements the spatial-social interface: evidence from Yellowstone bison. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1912):20220530. PMC: 11449198. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0530. View

2.
Webber Q, Laforge M, Bonar M, Vander Wal E . The adaptive value of density-dependent habitat specialization and social network centrality. Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4423. PMC: 11126670. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48657-8. View

3.
Nathan R, Getz W, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D . A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(49):19052-9. PMC: 2614714. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800375105. View

4.
Kaur P, Ciuti S, Ossi F, Cagnacci F, Morellet N, Loison A . A protocol for assessing bias and robustness of social network metrics using GPS based radio-telemetry data. Mov Ecol. 2024; 12(1):55. PMC: 11304672. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00494-6. View

5.
Williams H, Taylor L, Benhamou S, Bijleveld A, Clay T, de Grissac S . Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research. J Anim Ecol. 2019; 89(1):186-206. PMC: 7041970. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13094. View