» Articles » PMID: 39223193

Dynamics of Bio-based Carbon Dioxide Removal in Germany

Abstract

Bio-based carbon dioxide removal encompasses a range of (1) natural sink enhancement concepts in agriculture and on organic soils including peatlands, and in forestry, (2) bio-based building materials, and (3) bioenergy production with CO capture and storage (BECCS). A common database on these concepts is crucial for their consideration in strategies and implementation. In this study, we analyse standardised factsheets on these concepts. We find different dynamics of deployment until 2045: for CO removal rates from the atmosphere, natural sink enhancement concepts are characterised by gradually increasing rates, followed by a saturation and potentially a decrease after few decades; forest-related measures ramp up slowly and for construction projects and bioenergy plants, annually constant removal rates are assumed during operation which drop to zero afterwards. The expenses for removing 1 t CO from the atmosphere were found to be between 8 and 520 € t CO, which arises from high divergence both in capital and operational expenditures among the concepts. This high variability of expenses seems to suggest the more cost-effective concepts should be implemented first. However, aspects from economics, resource base and environmental impacts to social and political implications for Germany need to be considered for developing implementation strategies. All concepts investigated could be deployed on scales to significantly contribute to the German climate neutrality target.

References
1.
Wilkinson M, Sansone S, Schultes E, Doorn P, Bonino da Silva Santos L, Dumontier M . A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. Sci Data. 2018; 5:180118. PMC: 6018520. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.118. View

2.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

3.
Young D, Baird A, Charman D, Evans C, Gallego-Sala A, Gill P . Misinterpreting carbon accumulation rates in records from near-surface peat. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17939. PMC: 6884541. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53879-8. View

4.
Gunther A, Barthelmes A, Huth V, Joosten H, Jurasinski G, Koebsch F . Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming despite methane emissions. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):1644. PMC: 7118086. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15499-z. View

5.
Austin K, Baker J, Sohngen B, Wade C, Daigneault A, Ohrel S . The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world's forests to mitigate climate change. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):5946. PMC: 7708837. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19578-z. View