» Articles » PMID: 33262324

The Economic Costs of Planting, Preserving, and Managing the World's Forests to Mitigate Climate Change

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Dec 2
PMID 33262324
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Forests are critical for stabilizing our climate, but costs of mitigation over space, time, and stakeholder group remain uncertain. Using the Global Timber Model, we project mitigation potential and costs for four abatement activities across 16 regions for carbon price scenarios of $5-$100/tCO. We project 0.6-6.0 GtCOyr in global mitigation by 2055 at costs of 2-393 billion USD yr, with avoided tropical deforestation comprising 30-54% of total mitigation. Higher prices incentivize larger mitigation proportions via rotation and forest management activities in temperate and boreal biomes. Forest area increases 415-875 Mha relative to the baseline by 2055 at prices $35-$100/tCO, with intensive plantations comprising <7% of this increase. Mitigation costs borne by private land managers comprise less than one-quarter of total costs. For forests to contribute ~10% of mitigation needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C, carbon prices will need to reach $281/tCO in 2055.

Citing Articles

Investing in U.S. forests to mitigate climate change.

Favero A, Baker J, Sohngen B, Daigneault A, Wade C, Ohrel S Carbon Balance Manag. 2025; 20(1):4.

PMID: 40064712 PMC: 11895230. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-025-00292-6.


Advancing forest carbon projections requires improved convergence between ecological and economic models.

Fuller M, Ganjam M, Baker J, Abt R Carbon Balance Manag. 2025; 20(1):2.

PMID: 39792318 PMC: 11721258. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-024-00290-0.


Monitoring forest cover and land use change in the Congo Basin under IPCC climate change scenarios.

Yuh Y, NGoran K, Kross A, Heurich M, Matthews H, Turner S PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0311816.

PMID: 39621680 PMC: 11611213. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311816.


US land sector mitigation investments and emissions implications.

Favero A, Wade C, Cai Y, Ohrel S, Baker J, Creason J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9625.

PMID: 39511151 PMC: 11543690. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53915-w.


Temperature overshoot responses to ambitious forestation in an Earth System Model.

Moustakis Y, Nutzel T, Wey H, Bao W, Pongratz J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8235.

PMID: 39300072 PMC: 11413198. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52508-x.


References
1.
Forsell N, Turkovska O, Gusti M, Obersteiner M, den Elzen M, Havlik P . Assessing the INDCs' land use, land use change, and forest emission projections. Carbon Balance Manag. 2016; 11(1):26. PMC: 5145905. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-016-0068-3. View

2.
Curtis P, Slay C, Harris N, Tyukavina A, Hansen M . Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science. 2018; 361(6407):1108-1111. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau3445. View

3.
Ohrel S . Policy Perspective on the Role of Forest Sector Modeling. J For Econ. 2020; 34(3-4):187-204. PMC: 7077799. DOI: 10.1561/112.00000506. View

4.
Kindermann G, Obersteiner M, Sohngen B, Sathaye J, Andrasko K, Rametsteiner E . Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(30):10302-7. PMC: 2483236. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710616105. View

5.
Daigneault A, Sohngen B, Sedjo R . Economic approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(11):5664-71. DOI: 10.1021/es2030142. View