» Articles » PMID: 39221760

The Longitudinal Patterns of Depression Subtypes and Stressors in Depression Severity in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2024 Sep 2
PMID 39221760
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The current study aims to characterize the longitudinal patterns of depression subtypes and investigate the associations among the stability of depression subtypes, COVID-19-related stressors, and depression severity.

Methods: The study utilized data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, which is a national, long-term study of Canadian adults aged 45 and older (n = 12,957). Latent profile analysis was used to identify latent depression subtypes. Latent transition analysis was then applied to assess the stability of these subtypes over time. Hierarchical multivariate linear regression was used to explore the relationships among these identified depression subtypes, COVID-19-related stressors, and depression severity among males and females, respectively.

Results: Distinct depression subtypes were identified. Except for atypical depression, other depression subtypes showed greater stability over time. We also found that melancholic depression (B = 9.432) and typical depression (B = 6.677) were strongly associated with depression severity during the pandemic. Health-related stressors (B = 0.840), conflict (B = 3.639), difficulties accessing resources (B = 0.927), separation from family (B = 0.840), and caregiving experience (B = 0.764), were significantly associated with increased depression severity. Sex-specific analyses also revealed differences in the associations between stressors and depression severity between males and females.

Conclusions: This study contributes valuable insights into the latent clustering of depression subtypes and their stability. Stressors were associated with increased depression severity, with distinct associations observed among males and females. These findings have implications for targeted early interventions and integrated clinical management strategies by providing the evidence base for tailored mental health care during and after the pandemic.

References
1.
Zacher H, Rudolph C . Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Am Psychol. 2020; 76(1):50-62. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000702. View

2.
Veltman E, Kok A, Lamers F, Stek M, van der Mast R, Rhebergen D . Stability and transition of depression subtypes in late life. J Affect Disord. 2020; 265:445-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.049. View

3.
Suka M, Yamauchi T, Yanagisawa H . Changes in health status, workload, and lifestyle after starting the COVID-19 pandemic: a web-based survey of Japanese men and women. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021; 26(1):37. PMC: 7982907. DOI: 10.1186/s12199-021-00957-x. View

4.
Brooks S, Webster R, Smith L, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N . The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020; 395(10227):912-920. PMC: 7158942. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. View

5.
Lojko D, Rybakowski J . Atypical depression: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017; 13:2447-2456. PMC: 5614762. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S147317. View