» Articles » PMID: 32112714

The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Mar 1
PMID 32112714
Citations 6041
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.

Citing Articles

Access and use of general and mental health services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sculco C, Bano B, Prina E, Tedeschi F, Bartucz M, Barbui C BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e091342.

PMID: 40074252 PMC: 11904334. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091342.


The negative and positive: perceptions regarding COVID-19 pandemic among an online sample of adults; qualitative study.

Sundarapperuma T, Gamage M, Rathnayake N, Weeratunga E, Jagodage H BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):954.

PMID: 40065256 PMC: 11895231. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-22168-7.


Representative national survey on drug use during the COVID-19 stay-at-home order in the USA.

Lee S, Cullen B, Athey A, Holingue C, Kaufman M, Nestadt P BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e086141.

PMID: 40054867 PMC: 11891535. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086141.


Is forest bathing a panacea for mental health problems? A narrative review.

Chen H, Meng Z, Luo J Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1454992.

PMID: 40051516 PMC: 11882403. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1454992.


Relationship Between Personality Traits and Emotional Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Canadian Emerging Adults.

Moore M, Yunus F, Thompson K, Keough M, Krank M, Conrod P Emerg Adulthood. 2025; 13(2):363-377.

PMID: 40051415 PMC: 11879772. DOI: 10.1177/21676968241313068.


References
1.
Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M . The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003; 168(10):1245-51. PMC: 154178. View

2.
Marjanovic Z, Greenglass E, Coffey S . The relevance of psychosocial variables and working conditions in predicting nurses' coping strategies during the SARS crisis: an online questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 44(6):991-8. PMC: 7094220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.012. View

3.
Wang Y, Xu B, Zhao G, Cao R, He X, Fu S . Is quarantine related to immediate negative psychological consequences during the 2009 H1N1 epidemic?. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011; 33(1):75-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.11.001. View

4.
Mihashi M, Otsubo Y, Yinjuan X, Nagatomi K, Hoshiko M, Ishitake T . Predictive factors of psychological disorder development during recovery following SARS outbreak. Health Psychol. 2009; 28(1):91-100. DOI: 10.1037/a0013674. View

5.
Newman K . Shutt up: bubonic plague and quarantine in early modern England. J Soc Hist. 2012; 45(3):809-34. DOI: 10.1093/jsh/shr114. View