» Articles » PMID: 39220892

The Acceptability of Wearable Technology for Long-term Respiratory Disease: A Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Sep 2
PMID 39220892
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Few studies have investigated the acceptability of wearable technology in patients with long-term respiratory disease. We conducted a 24-item cross-sectional survey (September 2022-February 2023), developed using four common themes universal to previously described models of technology acceptance and social behavioural therapy, to explore the acceptability of wearable technology spanning the breadth of chronic respiratory disease. A total of 74 valid survey responses were analysed with 50 % aged 51-70years; 72 % female; 63 % white British ethnicity; 79 % having an income less than £50,000, and 93 % having at least obstructive airways disease. A third of participants current used wearables with 85 % using smart watches. Most of these participants used wearables to monitor their symptoms (69 %) and as a general health measurement device (85 %). Likert scale questions (ranked 1-7) showed that participants valued accuracy and approval of wearables by regulatory bodies (median (IQR) rank score 7 (Huberty et al., 2015; Preusse et al., 2016) 6-76-7 and felt that wearables would increase their confidence in managing their long-term health condition (median (IQR) rank score 6 (Huberty et al., 2015; Preusse et al., 2016) 6-76-7. Favourable product characteristics for wearables were accuracy (73 %), easy to learn (63 %) and easy to use (50 %). They were less concerned about aesthetics (23 %) and battery life (27 %). This survey will guide future developers to produce a wearable for a population with chronic respiratory disease which will improve acceptability, usability and longevity.

Citing Articles

The role of digital health in respiratory diseases management: a narrative review of recent literature.

Althobiani M, Russell A, Jacob J, Ranjan Y, Ahmad R, Folarin A Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1361667.

PMID: 40078397 PMC: 11896871. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1361667.

References
1.
Kononova A, Li L, Kamp K, Bowen M, Rikard R, Cotten S . The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(4):e9832. PMC: 6473213. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9832. View

2.
Dearing J . Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development. Res Soc Work Pract. 2010; 19(5):503-518. PMC: 2957672. DOI: 10.1177/1049731509335569. View

3.
Preusse K, Mitzner T, Fausset C, Rogers W . Older Adults' Acceptance of Activity Trackers. J Appl Gerontol. 2016; 36(2):127-155. PMC: 5149448. DOI: 10.1177/0733464815624151. View

4.
Romero-Perales E, Sainz-de-Baranda Andujar C, Lopez-Ongil C . Electronic Design for Wearables Devices Addressed from a Gender Perspective: Cross-Influences and a Methodological Proposal. Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(12). PMC: 10305441. DOI: 10.3390/s23125483. View

5.
Keogh A, Dorn J, Walsh L, Calvo F, Caulfield B . Comparing the Usability and Acceptability of Wearable Sensors Among Older Irish Adults in a Real-World Context: Observational Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(4):e15704. PMC: 7199137. DOI: 10.2196/15704. View