» Articles » PMID: 39210915

Evaluation of the Forces Applied by Rubber Dam Clamps on Mandibular First Molar Teeth with Different Endodontic Access Cavities: a 3D FEA Study

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2024 Aug 30
PMID 39210915
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aimed to examine the effect of the force applied by rubber dam clamps made from different materials on mandibular first molar teeth with various designs of endodontic access cavities using finite element analysis.

Methods: A intact tooth (IT) and seven different endodontic access cavities namely, a traditional endodontic cavity (TRADAC), a guided endodontic cavity (GEC), a conservative endodontic cavity (CAC), an ultra-conservative access cavity (UAC), a truss access endodontic cavity (TRSAC), a mesial caries access cavity (MCAC), and a distal caries access cavity (DCAC), along with two different clamp finite element models, were created. The clamp models were made of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and stainless steel (SS). The forces applied by the clamps were calculated based on the axial section distance of the tooth, and these forces were applied to the contact areas on the tooth. Stress distribution models were calculated using maximum von Mises (vM) stress.

Results: The lowest vM stress under the forces applied by the SS and PEEK clamps was found in the IT model (80.914 MPa) with the PEEK clamp. The highest vM stress was found in the DCAC model (759.49 MPa) applied with the SS clamp. The forces applied by SS clamps resulted in higher vM stress values in every cavity design than those applied by PEEK clamps.

Conclusion: PEEK clamps generated less force than SS clamps. However, clinicians should follow various isolation strategies (clamp made of different materials, split dam, .) according to different cavity types of the tooth.

References
1.
Saber S, Hayaty D, Nawar N, Kim H . The Effect of Access Cavity Designs and Sizes of Root Canal Preparations on the Biomechanical Behavior of an Endodontically Treated Mandibular First Molar: A Finite Element Analysis. J Endod. 2020; 46(11):1675-1681. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.040. View

2.
Sorrentino R, Aversa R, Ferro V, Auriemma T, Zarone F, Ferrari M . Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post, core and crown materials. Dent Mater. 2006; 23(8):983-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.08.006. View

3.
Ozyurek T, Ulker O, Demiryurek E, Yilmaz F . The Effects of Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation Design on the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Traditional Versus Conservative Preparation. J Endod. 2018; 44(5):800-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.020. View

4.
Zadik Y, Sandler V, Bechor R, Salehrabi R . Analysis of factors related to extraction of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106(5):e31-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.017. View

5.
Aslan T, Esim E, Ustun Y, Ozkan H . Evaluation of Stress Distributions in Mandibular Molar Teeth with Different Iatrogenic Root Perforations Repaired with Biodentine or Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Finite Element Analysis Study. J Endod. 2020; 47(4):631-640. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.11.018. View