Morphological Analysis of the Anatomical Mandibular Lingual Concavity Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in East Asian Population-A Retrospective Study

Overview

Journal Diagnostics (Basel)

Specialty Radiology

Date 2024 Aug 29

PMID 39202280

Authors

Hee-Ju Ahn

Soo-Hwan Byun

Sung-Ah Che

Sang-Yoon Park

Sang-Min Yi

In-Young Park

Sung-Woon On

Byoung-Eun Yang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The rising demand for dental implants necessitates addressing anatomical challenges, particularly the shape of the mandible. Incorrectly angling implants can cause lingual perforations, risking damage to the inferior alveolar artery and nerve. This study analyzed 96 cone-beam computed tomography images from individuals aged 20 to 70 (8 males and 8 females) to evaluate mandibular anatomy in four areas: left and right sides and the first and second molars. Mandibular shapes were classified into U, C, and P types. U-shaped mandibles, with a wider crest width, pose the highest risk of lingual perforation. Measurements for U-shaped types included concavity angle, length, and depth. Statistical analyses (T-tests and ANOVA) with a 95% confidence interval showed no significant differences between the left and right sides. However, significant differences based on gender, age, and tooth type were found. The study found U-shapes in 34.6% of cases, P-shapes in 28.9%, and C-shapes in 36.5%, with U-shapes more common in second molars. Understanding these variations enhances the safety and effectiveness of implant procedures and oral surgeries.

References

Pan Z, Xu S . Population genomics of East Asian ethnic groups. Hereditas. 2020; 157(1):49. PMC: 7724877. DOI: 10.1186/s41065-020-00162-w. View

Esposito M, Grusovin M, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R . Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010; 3(1):7-26. View

Yoon T, Patel M, Michaud R, Manibo A . Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Analysis of the Posterior and Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity for Dental Implant Patients. J Oral Implantol. 2016; 43(1):12-18. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00084. View

Givol N, Chaushu G, Taicher S . Emergency tracheostomy following life-threatening hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth during immediate implant placement in the mandibular canine region. J Periodontol. 2001; 71(12):1893-5. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1893. View

Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J . Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008; 37(1):10-7. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/14140281. View

Bolin A, ELIASSON S, von Beetzen M, Jansson L . Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7(4):354-9. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070408.x. View

Nickenig H, Wichmann M, Eitner S, Zoller J, Kreppel M . Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 43(2):254-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.018. View

Bodart L, Hanken H, Smeets R, Gosau M, Li C, Kluwe L . Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48(11):1045-1051. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001. View

Jain N, Gulati M, Garg M, Pathak C . Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(9):ZE14-ZE17. PMC: 5072098. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21838.8550. View

10.

de Souza L, Assis N, Ribeiro R, Carvalho A, Devito K . Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery. Ann Anat. 2016; 205:53-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.01.006. View

11.

Tyndall D, Price J, Tetradis S, Ganz S, Hildebolt C, Scarfe W . Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 113(6):817-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.005. View

12.

Chan H, Brooks S, Fu J, Yeh C, Rudek I, Wang H . Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 22(2):201-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x. View

13.

Herranz-Aparicio J, Marques J, Almendros-Marques N, Gay-Escoda C . Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016; 21(6):e731-e736. PMC: 5116115. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.21256. View

14.

Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, Tarnow D . Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(8):1317-29. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070067. View

15.

Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D . Practical application of anatomy for the dental implant surgeon. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(10):1833-46. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.080086. View

16.

Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H . Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 32(4):343-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-009-0570-3. View

17.

Tan W, Ng J, Bapat R, Chaubal T, Kishor Kanneppedy S . Evaluation of anatomic variations of mandibular lingual concavities from cone beam computed tomography scans in a Malaysian population. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125(5):766.e1-766.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.018. View

18.

Bayrak S, Demirturk-Kocasarac H, Yaprak E, Ustaoglu G, Noujeim M . Correlation between the visibility of submandibular fossa and mandibular canal cortication on panoramic radiographs and submandibular fossa depth on CBCT. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017; 23(1):e105-e111. PMC: 5822532. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22115. View

19.

Tepper G, Hofschneider U, Gahleitner A, Ulm C . Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16(1):68-72. View

20.

Quirynen M, Mraiwa N, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R . Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14(3):280-5. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140305.x. View