» Articles » PMID: 12755778

Morphology and Dimensions of the Mandibular Jaw Bone in the Interforaminal Region in Patients Requiring Implants in the Distal Areas

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2003 May 21
PMID 12755778
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to analyse variations in the mandibular interforaminal morphology in an attempt to identify potential risks or contraindications for surgery, especially implant installation, in this particular region. A total of 210 spiral computer tomography (CT) examinations of patients requiring endosseous implant installation in the lower jaw were re-evaluated to explore anatomical variations in bone morphology (shape and contour), and to measure parameters concerning height, width and inclination of the bone in the symphyseal atrea. All measurements were performed on the cross-sectional reformatted images mesial to the mental foramina. A lingual concavity (with a depth of 6 +/- 2.6 mm) was observed in 2.4% of the jaws, with a remaining bone height in that area ranging from 4.2 to 11.9 mm. A clearly lingual tilted/inclined morphology was seen in 28.1% of jaws with a mean angle of 67.6 +/- 6.5 degrees, but a relatively constant width (> 8.8 mm). The remaining jaws (69.5%) showed a slight broadening in the caudal direction. The morphologic parameters were influenced neither by age nor by gender. In conclusion, mandibles with a lingual concavity or a severe slope of the lingual cortex might confer increased risks of lingual perforations during trepanation surgery or graft harvesting as well as fenestrations during implant installation. The detection frequency of such variations within the lower jaw seems to advocate a profound dissection of the lingual site and, in the case of some special treatment strategies, additional cross-sectional radiography.

Citing Articles

Morphological Analysis of the Anatomical Mandibular Lingual Concavity Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in East Asian Population-A Retrospective Study.

Ahn H, Byun S, Che S, Park S, Yi S, Park I Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202280 PMC: 11353795. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161792.


Image fusion-based low-dose CBCT enhancement method for visualizing miniscrew insertion in the infrazygomatic crest.

Sun P, Yang J, Tian X, Yuan G BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):114.

PMID: 38760689 PMC: 11100247. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01289-2.


Evaluation of submandibular gland and submandibular fossa: a combined cone beam computed tomography and ultrasound study.

Akol Gorgun E, Caglayan F Eur Oral Res. 2023; 57(3):128-132.

PMID: 37929223 PMC: 10622153. DOI: 10.26650/eor.20231109135.


Influence of bone anatomical morphology of mandibular molars on dental implant based on CBCT.

Kong Z, Wang G, Liu X, Ye Z, Xu D, Ding X BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):528.

PMID: 34654414 PMC: 8518329. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01888-3.


The occurrence of dental implant malpositioning and related factors: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography survey.

Safi Y, Amid R, Zadbin F, Ahsaie M, Mortazavi H Imaging Sci Dent. 2021; 51(3):251-260.

PMID: 34621652 PMC: 8479431. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20200331.