» Articles » PMID: 39198644

Probing Plant Signal Processing Optogenetically by Two Channelrhodopsins

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Aug 28
PMID 39198644
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early plant responses to different stress situations often encompass cytosolic Ca increases, plasma membrane depolarization and the generation of reactive oxygen species. However, the mechanisms by which these signalling elements are translated into defined physiological outcomes are poorly understood. Here, to study the basis for encoding of specificity in plant signal processing, we used light-gated ion channels (channelrhodopsins). We developed a genetically engineered channelrhodopsin variant called XXM 2.0 with high Ca conductance that enabled triggering cytosolic Ca elevations in planta. Plant responses to light-induced Ca influx through XXM 2.0 were studied side by side with effects caused by an anion efflux through the light-gated anion channelrhodopsin ACR1 2.0. Although both tools triggered membrane depolarizations, their activation led to distinct plant stress responses: XXM 2.0-induced Ca signals stimulated production of reactive oxygen species and defence mechanisms; ACR1 2.0-mediated anion efflux triggered drought stress responses. Our findings imply that discrete Ca signals and anion efflux serve as triggers for specific metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming enabling plants to adapt to particular stress situations. Our optogenetics approach unveiled that within plant leaves, distinct physiological responses are triggered by specific ion fluxes, which are accompanied by similar electrical signals.

Citing Articles

Sodium-Selective Channelrhodopsins.

Coli A, Gao S, Kaestner L Cells. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39594600 PMC: 11592924. DOI: 10.3390/cells13221852.

References
1.
Fichman Y, Xiong H, Sengupta S, Morrow J, Loog H, Azad R . Phytochrome B regulates reactive oxygen signaling during abiotic and biotic stress in plants. New Phytol. 2022; 237(5):1711-1727. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18626. View

2.
Kollist H, Zandalinas S, Sengupta S, Nuhkat M, Kangasjarvi J, Mittler R . Rapid Responses to Abiotic Stress: Priming the Landscape for the Signal Transduction Network. Trends Plant Sci. 2018; 24(1):25-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.003. View

3.
Gilroy S, Bialasek M, Suzuki N, Gorecka M, Devireddy A, Karpinski S . ROS, Calcium, and Electric Signals: Key Mediators of Rapid Systemic Signaling in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171(3):1606-15. PMC: 4936577. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00434. View

4.
Zhou Y, Ding M, Gao S, Yu-Strzelczyk J, Krischke M, Duan X . Optogenetic control of plant growth by a microbial rhodopsin. Nat Plants. 2021; 7(2):144-151. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-00853-w. View

5.
Bharath P, Gahir S, Raghavendra A . Abscisic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure: An Important Component of Plant Defense Against Abiotic and Biotic Stress. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:615114. PMC: 7969522. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.615114. View