» Articles » PMID: 39197949

Presaccadic Attention Enhances and Reshapes the Contrast Sensitivity Function Differentially Around the Visual Field

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Aug 28
PMID 39197949
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contrast sensitivity (CS), which constrains human vision, decreases from fovea to periphery, from the horizontal to the vertical meridian, and from the lower vertical to the upper vertical meridian. It also depends on spatial frequency (SF), and the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) depicts this relation. To compensate for these visual constraints, we constantly make saccades and foveate on relevant objects in the scene. Already before saccade onset, presaccadic attention shifts to the saccade target and enhances perception. However, it is unknown whether and how it modulates the interplay between CS and SF, and if this effect varies around polar angle meridians. CS enhancement may result from a horizontal or vertical shift of the CSF, increase in bandwidth, or any combination. In addition, presaccadic attention could enhance CS similarly around the visual field, or it could benefit perception more at locations with poorer performance (i.e., vertical meridian). Here, we investigated these possibilities by extracting key attributes of the CSF of human observers. The results reveal that presaccadic attention (1) increases CS across SF, (2) increases the most preferred and the highest discernable SF, and (3) narrows the bandwidth. Therefore, presaccadic attention helps bridge the gap between presaccadic and postsaccadic input by increasing visibility at the saccade target. Counterintuitively, this CS enhancement was more pronounced where perception is better-along the horizontal than the vertical meridian-exacerbating polar angle asymmetries. Our results call for an investigation of the differential neural modulations underlying presaccadic perceptual changes for different saccade directions.

Citing Articles

How the window of visibility varies around polar angle.

Kwak Y, Lu Z, Carrasco M J Vis. 2024; 24(12):4.

PMID: 39499527 PMC: 11542588. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.12.4.


Presaccadic preview shapes postsaccadic processing more where perception is poor.

Liu X, Melcher D, Carrasco M, Hanning N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(37):e2411293121.

PMID: 39236235 PMC: 11406264. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411293121.


How the window of visibility varies around polar angle.

Kwak Y, Lu Z, Carrasco M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39071431 PMC: 11275830. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.12.603257.

References
1.
Virsu V, Rovamo J . Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Exp Brain Res. 1979; 37(3):475-94. DOI: 10.1007/BF00236818. View

2.
Herwig A . Transsaccadic integration and perceptual continuity. J Vis. 2015; 15(16):7. DOI: 10.1167/15.16.7. View

3.
Zhao Y, Lesmes L, Dorr M, Lu Z . Quantifying Uncertainty of the Estimated Visual Acuity Behavioral Function With Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021; 10(12):18. PMC: 8525832. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.18. View

4.
Schlykowa L, Hoffmann K, Bremmer F, Thiele A, Ehrenstein W . Monkey saccadic latency and pursuit velocity show a preference for upward directions of target motion. Neuroreport. 1996; 7(2):409-12. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199601310-00008. View

5.
Abrams J, Nizam A, Carrasco M . Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry. Vision Res. 2011; 52(1):70-8. PMC: 3345502. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.016. View