Exploring the Barriers, Facilitators and Needs to Use Patient Outcomes in District Nursing Care: A Multi-method Qualitative Study

Overview

Journal J Clin Nurs

Specialty Nursing

Date 2024 Aug 23

PMID 39177259

Authors

Jessica Desiree Veldhuizen

Frans Van Wijngaarden

Misja Chiljon Mikkers

Marieke Joanne Schuurmans

Nienke Bleijenberg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim And Objectives: To provide an in-depth insight into the barriers, facilitators and needs of district nurses and nurse assistants on using patient outcomes in district nursing care.

Background: As healthcare demands grow, particularly in district nursing, there is a significant need to understand how to systematically measure and improve patient outcomes in this setting. Further investigation is needed to identify the barriers and facilitators for effective implementation.

Design: A multi-method qualitative study.

Methods: Open-ended questions of a survey study (N = 132) were supplemented with in-depth online focus group interviews involving district nurses and nurse assistants (N = 26) in the Netherlands. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Different barriers, facilitators and needs were identified and compiled into 16 preconditions for using outcomes in district nursing care. These preconditions were summarised into six overarching themes: follow the steps of a learning healthcare system; provide patient-centred care; promote the professional's autonomy, attitude, knowledge and skills; enhance shared responsibility and collaborations within and outside organisational boundaries; prioritise and invest in the use of outcomes; and boost the unity and appreciation for district nursing care.

Conclusions: The preconditions identified in this study are crucial for nurses, care providers, policymakers and payers in implementing the use of patient outcomes in district nursing practice. Further exploration of appropriate strategies is necessary for a successful implementation.

Relevance To Clinical Practice: This study represents a significant step towards implementing the use of patient outcomes in district nursing care. While most research has focused on hospitals and general practitioner settings, this study focuses on the needs for district nursing care. By identifying 16 key preconditions across themes such as patient-centred care, professional autonomy and unity, the findings offer valuable guidance for integrating a learning healthcare system that prioritises the measurement and continuous improvement of patient outcomes in district nursing.

Reporting Method: Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines.

Patient Of Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Citing Articles

Advancing District Nursing Care Through a Learning Healthcare System: A Viewpoint on Key Requirements.

Veldhuizen J, Schuurmans M, Mikkers M, Bleijenberg N Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39766002 PMC: 11727908. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242576.

Exploring the barriers, facilitators and needs to use patient outcomes in district nursing care: A multi-method qualitative study.

Veldhuizen J, Van Wijngaarden F, Mikkers M, Schuurmans M, Bleijenberg N J Clin Nurs. 2024; 33(12):4781-4794.

PMID: 39177259 PMC: 11579565. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17407.

References

MacLean L, Hassmiller S, Shaffer F, Rohrbaugh K, Collier T, Fairman J . Scale, causes, and implications of the primary care nursing shortage. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014; 35:443-57. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182508. View

Verheij R, Curcin V, Delaney B, McGilchrist M . Possible Sources of Bias in Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data Use and Reuse. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(5):e185. PMC: 5997930. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9134. View

Veldhuizen J, Schuurmans M, Mikkers M, Bleijenberg N . Exploring nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in Dutch district nursing care: A survey study. Health Soc Care Community. 2022; 30(6):e5624-e5636. PMC: 10087021. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13988. View

Menear M, Blanchette M, Demers-Payette O, Roy D . A framework for value-creating learning health systems. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019; 17(1):79. PMC: 6688264. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0477-3. View

Franklin P, Chenok K, Lavalee D, Love R, Paxton L, Segal C . Framework To Guide The Collection And Use Of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures In The Learning Healthcare System. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018; 5(1):17. PMC: 5983040. DOI: 10.5334/egems.227. View

Jarrin O, Pouladi F, Madigan E . International priorities for home care education, research, practice, and management: Qualitative content analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2018; 73:83-87. PMC: 6713276. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.11.020. View

Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S . Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):189. PMC: 6432749. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3. View

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

van Engen V, Bonfrer I, Ahaus K, Buljac-Samardzic M . Value-Based Healthcare From the Perspective of the Healthcare Professional: A Systematic Literature Review. Front Public Health. 2022; 9:800702. PMC: 8792751. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.800702. View

10.

Foster A, Croot L, Brazier J, Harris J, OCathain A . The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018; 2:46. PMC: 6170512. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0072-3. View

11.

De Groot K, de Veer A, Munster A, Francke A, Paans W . Nursing documentation and its relationship with perceived nursing workload: a mixed-methods study among community nurses. BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1):34. PMC: 8795724. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00811-7. View

12.

van Staalduinen D, van den Bekerom P, Groeneveld S, Kidanemariam M, Stiggelbout A, Elske van den Akker-van Marle M . The implementation of value-based healthcare: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):270. PMC: 8886826. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07489-2. View

13.

Stover A, Haverman L, van Oers H, Greenhalgh J, Potter C . Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Qual Life Res. 2020; 30(11):3015-3033. PMC: 8528754. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9. View

14.

Powell B, Fernandez M, Williams N, Aarons G, Beidas R, Lewis C . Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:3. PMC: 6350272. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003. View

15.

De Groot K, Triemstra M, Paans W, Francke A . Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: A systematic review of systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2018; 75(7):1379-1393. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13919. View

16.

Budrionis A, Bellika J . The Learning Healthcare System: Where are we now? A systematic review. J Biomed Inform. 2016; 64:87-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.018. View

17.

Matthews K, Baird M, Duchesne G . Using Online Meeting Software to Facilitate Geographically Dispersed Focus Groups for Health Workforce Research. Qual Health Res. 2018; 28(10):1621-1628. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318782167. View

18.

Miller H . From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28(5):1418-28. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1418. View

19.

Veldhuizen J, van den Bulck A, Elissen A, Mikkers M, Schuurmans M, Bleijenberg N . Nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A Delphi study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251546. PMC: 8118269. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251546. View

20.

Friedman C, Rubin J, Sullivan K . Toward an Information Infrastructure for Global Health Improvement. Yearb Med Inform. 2017; 26(1):16-23. PMC: 6239237. DOI: 10.15265/IY-2017-004. View