» Articles » PMID: 39157280

The Association of AMH Level with the Number and Quality of Oocytes in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI: A Single-Center Study

Overview
Date 2024 Aug 19
PMID 39157280
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The recognized role of Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as a marker for women's biological age and ovarian reserve prompts debate on its efficacy in predicting oocyte quality during IVF/ICSI. Recent findings challenging this view compelled us to conduct this study to examine the correlation between AMH levels and quantity/quality of oocytes in IVF/ICSI procedures.

Methods: The data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of 320 women between 25-42 years old. The included patients were divided into two groups: the high AMH group (>1.1 ) and the low AMH (=<1.1 ) group. The high AMH group comprised 213 patients, while the low AMH group consisted of 107 patients. Spearman's correlation coefficient and Multinomial logistic regression were computed to assess the relationships between different variables.

Results: Significant positive correlations were detected between AMH level and the number of aspirated follicles (rho=0.741, p<0.001), retrieved oocytes (rho=0.659, p<0.001), M2 oocytes (rho=0.624, p<0.001), grade A embryos (rho=0.419, p<0.001), and grade AB embryos (rho=0.446, p<0.001. In contrast, AMH levels had negative associations with the number and duration of cycles (p<0.05). AMH emerged as a statistically significant independent predictor of the number of M2 oocytes.

Conclusions: Serum AMH level could represent the quantity and quality of oocytes following IVF/ICSI treatments. Future studies should aim to delve deeper into the correlations between AMH levels and both the quality and quantity of embryos. Additionally, it would be beneficial to consider the influence of sperm factors, as well as assess pregnancy rates.

Citing Articles

Optimizing infertility treatment for ovarian endometrioma: is surgical intervention preferable before or after in-vitro fertilization programs?.

Sini I, Joe A, Handayani N, Wulandari T, Sundari A, Sirait B Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 40044926 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-07954-3.


The best ovarian reserve marker to predict ovarian response following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Salemi F, Jambarsang S, Kheirkhah A, Salehi-Abargouei A, Ahmadnia Z, Hosseini H Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):303.

PMID: 39695880 PMC: 11657140. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02684-0.

References
1.
Morin S, Patounakis G, Juneau C, Neal S, Scott R, Seli E . Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(8):1489-1498. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey238. View

2.
Papas M, Govaere J, Peere S, Gerits I, Van de Velde M, Angel-Velez D . Anti-Müllerian Hormone and OPU-ICSI Outcome in the Mare. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(7). PMC: 8300260. DOI: 10.3390/ani11072004. View

3.
Parsanezhad M, Jahromi B, Rezaee S, Kooshesh L, Alaee S . The Effect of Four Different Gonadotropin Protocols on Oocyte and Embryo Quality and Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles; A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2017; 42(1):57-65. PMC: 5337766. View

4.
Zhao D, Fan J, Wang P, Jiang X, Yao J, Li X . Age-specific definition of low anti-Mullerian hormone and associated pregnancy outcome in women undergoing IVF treatment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):186. PMC: 7936413. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03649-0. View

5.
Weenen C, Laven J, von Bergh A, Cranfield M, Groome N, Visser J . Anti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004; 10(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gah015. View