» Articles » PMID: 32765424

Analysis of IVF/ICSI-FET Outcomes in Women With Advanced Endometriosis: Influence on Ovarian Response and Oocyte Competence

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Aug 9
PMID 32765424
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To determine the impact of advanced endometriosis (EMS) on fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-FET) outcomes and analyze the influencing factors. A retrospective study was conducted on sterile women with ovarian endometriomas (OMAs), including patients who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy ( = 224, 224 IVF/ICSI cycles, 205 FET cycles) and aspiration ( = 139, 139 IVF/ICSI cycles, 148 FET cycles); peritoneal EMS ( = 96, 96 IVF/ICSI cycles, 89 FET cycles); and tubal factors ( = 360, 360 IVF/ICSI cycles, 474 FET cycles). Our main outcomes included the number of MII oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, the number of viable embryos, viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved in oocyte retrieval cycles, and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, live birth rate per transfer, and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate of this oocyte retrieval cycle in FET cycles. Finally, binary logistic regression analysis was performed to generate a prediction model for cumulative clinical pregnancy. The results showed that significantly fewer MII oocytes retrieved and viable embryos and lower viable embryo rate and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate were observed in women with EMS compared with the control. Women with peritoneal EMS had lower fertilization rate and viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved than patients with OMA (all < 0.05). However, the pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between the two phenotypes. The patients who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy had fewer MII oocytes retrieved and viable embryos compared with those with intact endometrioma(s) but no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between the two types of OMA patients. By binary logistic regression analysis, antral follicle count (AFC) was found to be an independent factor associated with cumulative clinical pregnancy in this oocyte retrieval cycle (odds ratio = 1.054; 95% confidence interval, 1.011-1.100; = 0.014), and the AFC prediction model of cumulative clinical pregnancy was established, with an area under the curve of 0.60. Our data supported that advanced EMS has negative effect on cumulative clinical pregnancy per oocyte retrieval cycle, and AFC is an independent predictor, which is mainly caused by poor ovarian response associated with OMA or its surgery and the damage of peritoneal EMS to oocyte maturation.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Endometriosis on Reproductive Outcomes in ART Cycles.

Ebrahimpoor M, Firouzabadi R, Javaheri A, Shamsi F, Dashti S Adv Biomed Res. 2024; 13:89.

PMID: 39512416 PMC: 11542699. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_436_23.


The Association of AMH Level with the Number and Quality of Oocytes in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI: A Single-Center Study.

Heidary Z, Masoumi M, Dashtkoohi M, Sharifinejad N, Dehghan Tarzjani M, Ghaemi M J Reprod Infertil. 2024; 25(1):38-45.

PMID: 39157280 PMC: 11330201. DOI: 10.18502/jri.v25i1.15197.


Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting clinical pregnancy in endometriosis patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer.

Zhu S, Liao X, Jiang W, Sun Y, Chen X, Zheng B BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):764.

PMID: 37907870 PMC: 10617063. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06082-7.


Expression of Gene in Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review.

Lazim N, Elias M, Sutaji Z, Abdul Karim A, Abu M, Ugusman A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).

PMID: 37629050 PMC: 10454210. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612869.


Ovarian endometrioma increases the embryo aneuploid rate: an analysis of 7092 biopsied blastocysts from fertile monogenetic disease carriers.

Yan N, Yuan X, Huang S, Jie H, Wang J, Yuan Y BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):244.

PMID: 37161418 PMC: 10170813. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02406-z.


References
1.
Hamdan M, Omar S, Dunselman G, Cheong Y . Influence of endometriosis on assisted reproductive technology outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(1):79-88. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000592. View

2.
Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka M, de Mouzon J, Erb K, Mocanu E . Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(10):1957-1973. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex264. View

3.
Benaglia L, Candotti G, Papaleo E, Pagliardini L, Leonardi M, Reschini M . Pregnancy outcome in women with endometriosis achieving pregnancy with IVF. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(12):2730-2736. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew210. View

4.
Broi M, Navarro P . Oxidative stress and oocyte quality: ethiopathogenic mechanisms of minimal/mild endometriosis-related infertility. Cell Tissue Res. 2015; 364(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-015-2339-9. View

5.
Al-Azemi M, Bernal A, Steele J, Gramsbergen I, Barlow D, Kennedy S . Ovarian response to repeated controlled stimulation in in-vitro fertilization cycles in patients with ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1999; 15(1):72-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.72. View