» Articles » PMID: 39151432

Strategic Stabilization of Arousal Boosts Sustained Attention

Overview
Journal Curr Biol
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Aug 16
PMID 39151432
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arousal and motivation interact to profoundly influence behavior. For example, experience tells us that we have some capacity to control our arousal when appropriately motivated, such as staying awake while driving a motor vehicle. However, little is known about how arousal and motivation jointly influence decision computations, including if and how animals, such as rodents, adapt their arousal state to their needs. Here, we developed and show results from an auditory, feature-based, sustained-attention task with intermittently shifting task utility. We use pupil size to estimate arousal across a wide range of states and apply tailored signal-detection theoretic, hazard function, and accumulation-to-bound modeling approaches in a large cohort of mice. We find that pupil-linked arousal and task utility both have major impacts on multiple aspects of task performance. Although substantial arousal fluctuations persist across utility conditions, mice partially stabilize their arousal near an intermediate and optimal level when task utility is high. Behavioral analyses show that multiple elements of behavior improve during high task utility and that arousal influences some, but not all, of them. Specifically, arousal influences the likelihood and timescale of sensory evidence accumulation but not the quantity of evidence accumulated per time step while attending. In sum, the results establish specific decision-computational signatures of arousal, motivation, and their interaction in attention. So doing, we provide an experimental and analysis framework for studying arousal self-regulation in neurotypical brains and in diseases such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Citing Articles

Modulation of metastable ensemble dynamics explains optimal coding at moderate arousal in auditory cortex.

Papadopoulos L, Jo S, Zumwalt K, Wehr M, McCormick D, Mazzucato L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38617286 PMC: 11014582. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.04.588209.

References
1.
Ashwood Z, Roy N, Stone I, Urai A, Churchland A, Pouget A . Mice alternate between discrete strategies during perceptual decision-making. Nat Neurosci. 2022; 25(2):201-212. PMC: 8890994. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-021-01007-z. View

2.
de Gee J, Tsetsos K, Schwabe L, Urai A, McCormick D, McGinley M . Pupil-linked phasic arousal predicts a reduction of choice bias across species and decision domains. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7297536. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.54014. View

3.
Baron R, Kenny D . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51(6):1173-82. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173. View

4.
Alnaes D, Sneve M, Espeseth T, Endestad T, van de Pavert S, Laeng B . Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. J Vis. 2014; 14(4). DOI: 10.1167/14.4.1. View

5.
Usher M, McClelland J . The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(3):550-92. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550. View