» Articles » PMID: 39146324

Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis from Tongue Swabs Using Sonication and Sequence-specific Hybridization Capture

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Aug 15
PMID 39146324
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tongue swabs hold promise as a non-invasive sample for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB). However, their utility as replacements for sputum has been limited by their varied diagnostic performance in PCR assays compared to sputum. The use of silica-based DNA extraction methods may limit sensitivity due to incomplete lysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) cells and co-extraction of non-target nucleic acid, which may inhibit PCR. Specificity may also be compromised because these methods are labor-intensive and prone to cross-contamination. To address these limitations, we developed a sample preparation method that combines sonication for MTB lysis and a sequence-specific MTB DNA capture method using hybridization probes immobilized on magnetic beads. In spiked tongue swabs, our hybridization capture method demonstrated a 100-fold increase in MTB DNA yield over silica-based Qiagen DNA extraction and ethanol precipitation. In a study conducted on clinical samples from South Africa, our protocol had 74% (70/94) sensitivity and 98% (41/42) specificity for detecting active pulmonary TB with sputum Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra as the reference standard. While hybridization capture did not show improved sensitivity over Qiagen DNA extraction and ethanol precipitation, it demonstrated better specificity than previously reported methods and was easier to perform. With integration into point-of-care platforms, these strategies have the potential to help enable rapid non-sputum-based TB diagnosis across key underserved patient populations.

Citing Articles

High-sensitivity detection of DNA in tongue swab samples.

Olson A, Wood R, Weigel K, Yan A, Lochner K, Dragovich R J Clin Microbiol. 2025; 63(2):e0114024.

PMID: 39745422 PMC: 11837540. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01140-24.


High-sensitivity detection of DNA in tongue swab samples.

Olson A, Wood R, Weigel K, Yan A, Lochner K, Dragovich R medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39108520 PMC: 11302704. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.26.24311064.

References
1.
Brugiere O, Vokurka M, Lecossier D, Mangiapan G, Amrane A, Milleron B . Diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis using sequence capture polymerase chain reaction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 155(4):1478-81. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105098. View

2.
LaCourse S, Seko E, Wood R, Bundi W, Ouma G, Agaya J . Diagnostic performance of oral swabs for non-sputum based TB diagnosis in a TB/HIV endemic setting. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262123. PMC: 8758000. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262123. View

3.
Luabeya A, Wood R, Shenje J, Filander E, Ontong C, Mabwe S . Noninvasive Detection of Tuberculosis by Oral Swab Analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2018; 57(3). PMC: 6425180. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01847-18. View

4.
Vincent A, Nyongesa S, Morneau I, Reed M, Tocheva E, Veyrier F . The Mycobacterial Cell Envelope: A Relict From the Past or the Result of Recent Evolution?. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:2341. PMC: 6194230. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02341. View

5.
Bello G, Morais F, Wolf J, Gehlen M, Dos Santos Soares T, Halon M . Improvement of Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection in sputum using DNA extracted by sonication. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020; 24(5):398-404. PMC: 9392136. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2020.08.006. View