» Articles » PMID: 33635932

Ultrasensitive Hybridization Capture: Reliable Detection of <1 Copy/mL Short Cell-free DNA from Large-volume Urine Samples

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Feb 26
PMID 33635932
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Urine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a valuable non-invasive biomarker with broad potential clinical applications, but there is no consensus on its optimal pre-analytical methodology, including the DNA extraction step. Due to its short length (majority of fragments <100 bp) and low concentration (ng/mL), urine cfDNA is not efficiently recovered by conventional silica-based extraction methods. To maximize sensitivity of urine cfDNA assays, we developed an ultrasensitive hybridization method that uses sequence-specific oligonucleotide capture probes immobilized on magnetic beads to improve extraction of short cfDNA from large-volume urine samples. Our hybridization method recovers near 100% (95% CI: 82.6-117.6%) of target-specific DNA from 10 mL urine, independent of fragment length (25-150 bp), and has a limit of detection of ≤5 copies of double-stranded DNA (0.5 copies/mL). Pairing hybridization with an ultrashort qPCR design, we can efficiently capture and amplify fragments as short as 25 bp. Our method enables amplification of cfDNA from 10 mL urine in a single qPCR well, tolerates variation in sample composition, and effectively removes non-target DNA. Our hybridization protocol improves upon both existing silica-based urine cfDNA extraction methods and previous hybridization-based sample preparation protocols. Two key innovations contribute to the strong performance of our method: a two-probe system enabling recovery of both strands of double-stranded DNA and dual biotinylated capture probes, which ensure consistent, high recovery by facilitating optimal probe density on the bead surface, improving thermostability of the probe-bead linkage, and eliminating interference by endogenous biotin. We originally designed the hybridization method for tuberculosis diagnosis from urine cfDNA, but expect that it will be versatile across urine cfDNA targets, and may be useful for other cfDNA sample types and applications beyond cfDNA. To make our hybridization method accessible to new users, we present a detailed protocol and straightforward guidelines for designing new capture probes.

Citing Articles

Cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis obtained from plasma of children with active tuberculosis.

Quan S, Tian X, Sun Y, Qi H, Jiao W, Sun B BMC Pediatr. 2025; 25(1):164.

PMID: 40033239 PMC: 11874688. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-025-05526-7.


Sample-to-answer detection of miRNA from whole blood using thermally responsive alkane partitions.

Benke E, Boegner D, Bogusch A, White I Biosens Bioelectron. 2024; 271:117052.

PMID: 39675942 PMC: 11700762. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2024.117052.


Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from tongue swabs using sonication and sequence-specific hybridization capture.

Yan A, Olson A, Weigel K, Luabeya A, Heiniger E, Hatherill M PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308235.

PMID: 39146324 PMC: 11326604. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308235.


Metagenomic DNA sequencing to quantify Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA and diagnose tuberculosis.

Chang A, Mzava O, Djomnang L, Lenz J, Burnham P, Kaplinsky P Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16972.

PMID: 36216964 PMC: 9551046. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21244-x.


Characterizing the molecular composition and diagnostic potential of Mycobacterium tuberculosis urinary cell-free DNA using next-generation sequencing.

Oreskovic A, Waalkes A, Holmes E, Rosenthal C, Wilson D, Shapiro A Int J Infect Dis. 2021; 112:330-337.

PMID: 34562627 PMC: 8627387. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.042.


References
1.
Samarasinghe S, Meah F, Singh V, Basit A, Emanuele N, Emanuele M . BIOTIN INTERFERENCE WITH ROUTINE CLINICAL IMMUNOASSAYS: UNDERSTAND THE CAUSES AND MITIGATE THE RISKS. Endocr Pract. 2017; 23(8):989-998. DOI: 10.4158/EP171761.RA. View

2.
Millar D, Withey S, Tizard M, Ford J, Hermon-Taylor J . Solid-phase hybridization capture of low-abundance target DNA sequences: application to the polymerase chain reaction detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. silvaticum. Anal Biochem. 1995; 226(2):325-30. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1995.1232. View

3.
Van Ness J, Chen L . The use of oligodeoxynucleotide probes in chaotrope-based hybridization solutions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19(19):5143-51. PMC: 328868. DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.19.5143. View

4.
Burnham P, Kim M, Agbor-Enoh S, Luikart H, Valantine H, Khush K . Single-stranded DNA library preparation uncovers the origin and diversity of ultrashort cell-free DNA in plasma. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:27859. PMC: 4906518. DOI: 10.1038/srep27859. View

5.
Peterson A, Heaton R, Georgiadis R . The effect of surface probe density on DNA hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 29(24):5163-8. PMC: 97561. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.24.5163. View