» Articles » PMID: 39132980

Incorporating Patient Values in Large Language Model Recommendations for Surrogate and Proxy Decisions

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Aug 12
PMID 39132980
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Surrogates, proxies, and clinicians making shared treatment decisions for patients who have lost decision-making capacity often fail to honor patients' wishes, due to stress, time pressures, misunderstanding patient values, and projecting personal biases. Advance directives intend to align care with patient values but are limited by low completion rates and application to only a subset of medical decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of large language models (LLMs) to incorporate patient values in supporting critical care clinical decision-making for incapacitated patients in a proof-of-concept study.

Methods: We simulated text-based scenarios for 50 decisionally incapacitated patients for whom a medical condition required imminent clinical decisions regarding specific interventions. For each patient, we also simulated five unique value profiles captured using alternative formats: numeric ranking questionnaires, text-based questionnaires, and free-text narratives. We used pre-trained generative LLMs for two tasks: 1) text extraction of the treatments under consideration and 2) prompt-based question-answering to generate a recommendation in response to the scenario information, extracted treatment, and patient value profiles. Model outputs were compared with adjudications by three domain experts who independently evaluated each scenario and decision.

Results And Conclusions: Automated extractions of the treatment in question were accurate for 88% (n = 44/50) of scenarios. LLM treatment recommendations received an average Likert score by the adjudicators of 3.92 of 5.00 (five being best) across all patients for being medically plausible and reasonable treatment recommendations, and 3.58 of 5.00 for reflecting the documented values of the patient. Scores were highest when patient values were captured as short, unstructured, and free-text narratives based on simulated patient profiles. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential for LLMs to function as support tools for surrogates, proxies, and clinicians aiming to honor the wishes and values of decisionally incapacitated patients.

References
1.
Butow P, Hoque E . Using artificial intelligence to analyse and teach communication in healthcare. Breast. 2020; 50:49-55. PMC: 7375542. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.008. View

2.
Shalowitz D, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D . How should treatment decisions be made for incapacitated patients, and why?. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(3):e35. PMC: 1820603. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040035. View

3.
Sudore R, Landefeld C, Barnes D, Lindquist K, Williams B, Brody R . An advance directive redesigned to meet the literacy level of most adults: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 69(1-3):165-95. PMC: 2257986. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.015. View

4.
Kiersch C, Potter T . Making Advance Directives Visual: Introducing Young Adults to Advance Care Planning With Video-Recorded Advance Directives. Creat Nurs. 2019; 25(4):e44-e51. DOI: 10.1891/1078-4535.25.4.e44. View

5.
Wu S, Roberts K, Datta S, Du J, Ji Z, Si Y . Deep learning in clinical natural language processing: a methodical review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 27(3):457-470. PMC: 7025365. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz200. View