» Articles » PMID: 36347603

Ethics of the Algorithmic Prediction of Goal of Care Preferences: from Theory to Practice

Overview
Journal J Med Ethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2022 Nov 8
PMID 36347603
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are quickly gaining ground in healthcare and clinical decision-making. However, it is still unclear in what way AI can or should support decision-making that is based on incapacitated patients' values and goals of care, which often requires input from clinicians and loved ones. Although the use of algorithms to predict patients' most likely preferred treatment has been discussed in the medical ethics literature, no example has been realised in clinical practice. This is due, arguably, to the lack of a structured approach to the epistemological, ethical and pragmatic challenges arising from the design and use of such algorithms. The present paper offers a new perspective on the problem by suggesting that preference predicting AIs be viewed as sociotechnical systems with distinctive life-cycles. We explore how both known and novel challenges map onto the different stages of development, highlighting interdisciplinary strategies for their resolution.

Citing Articles

Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.

Balch J, Chatham A, Hong P, Manganiello L, Baskaran N, Bihorac A Front Artif Intell. 2024; 7:1477447.

PMID: 39564457 PMC: 11573790. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447.


Incorporating Patient Values in Large Language Model Recommendations for Surrogate and Proxy Decisions.

Nolan V, Balch J, Baskaran N, Shickel B, Efron P, Upchurch Jr G Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(8):e1131.

PMID: 39132980 PMC: 11321752. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001131.


The Role of Humanization and Robustness of Large Language Models in Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Individuals With Depression: A Critical Analysis.

Ferrario A, Sedlakova J, Trachsel M JMIR Ment Health. 2024; 11:e56569.

PMID: 38958218 PMC: 11231450. DOI: 10.2196/56569.


Clearing the Fog: A Scoping Literature Review on the Ethical Issues Surrounding Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices.

Maccaro A, Stokes K, Statham L, He L, Williams A, Pecchia L J Pers Med. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38793025 PMC: 11121798. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050443.


A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable.

Earp B, Porsdam Mann S, Allen J, Salloch S, Suren V, Jongsma K Am J Bioeth. 2024; 24(7):13-26.

PMID: 38226965 PMC: 11248995. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2296402.


References
1.
Markus A, Kors J, Rijnbeek P . The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: A comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies. J Biomed Inform. 2020; 113:103655. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655. View

2.
Biller-Andorno N, Biller A . Algorithm-Aided Prediction of Patient Preferences - An Ethics Sneak Peek. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(15):1480-1485. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMms1904869. View

3.
Auriemma C, Halpern S, Asch J, Van Der Tuyn M, Asch D . Completion of Advance Directives and Documented Care Preferences During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(7):e2015762. PMC: 7372322. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15762. View

4.
Yadav K, Gabler N, Cooney E, Kent S, Kim J, Herbst N . Approximately One In Three US Adults Completes Any Type Of Advance Directive For End-Of-Life Care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36(7):1244-1251. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0175. View

5.
Ziebland S, Herxheimer A . How patients' experiences contribute to decision making: illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). J Nurs Manag. 2008; 16(4):433-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00863.x. View