Ethics of the Algorithmic Prediction of Goal of Care Preferences: from Theory to Practice
Overview
Affiliations
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are quickly gaining ground in healthcare and clinical decision-making. However, it is still unclear in what way AI can or should support decision-making that is based on incapacitated patients' values and goals of care, which often requires input from clinicians and loved ones. Although the use of algorithms to predict patients' most likely preferred treatment has been discussed in the medical ethics literature, no example has been realised in clinical practice. This is due, arguably, to the lack of a structured approach to the epistemological, ethical and pragmatic challenges arising from the design and use of such algorithms. The present paper offers a new perspective on the problem by suggesting that preference predicting AIs be viewed as sociotechnical systems with distinctive life-cycles. We explore how both known and novel challenges map onto the different stages of development, highlighting interdisciplinary strategies for their resolution.
Balch J, Chatham A, Hong P, Manganiello L, Baskaran N, Bihorac A Front Artif Intell. 2024; 7:1477447.
PMID: 39564457 PMC: 11573790. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447.
Nolan V, Balch J, Baskaran N, Shickel B, Efron P, Upchurch Jr G Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(8):e1131.
PMID: 39132980 PMC: 11321752. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001131.
Ferrario A, Sedlakova J, Trachsel M JMIR Ment Health. 2024; 11:e56569.
PMID: 38958218 PMC: 11231450. DOI: 10.2196/56569.
Maccaro A, Stokes K, Statham L, He L, Williams A, Pecchia L J Pers Med. 2024; 14(5).
PMID: 38793025 PMC: 11121798. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050443.
Earp B, Porsdam Mann S, Allen J, Salloch S, Suren V, Jongsma K Am J Bioeth. 2024; 24(7):13-26.
PMID: 38226965 PMC: 11248995. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2296402.