Attitude of Aspiring Orthopaedic Surgeons Towards Artificial Intelligence: a Multinational Cross-sectional Survey Study

Overview

Journal Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2024 Aug 10

PMID 39127806

Authors

Johannes Pawelczyk

Moritz Kraus

Larissa Eckl

Stefan Nehrer

Matthias Aurich

Kaywan Izadpanah

Sebastian Siebenlist

Marco-Christopher Rupp

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of aspiring orthopaedic surgeons on artificial intelligence (AI), analysing how gender, AI knowledge, and technical inclination influence views on AI. Additionally, the extent to which recent AI advancements sway career decisions was assessed.

Materials And Methods: A digital survey was distributed to student members of orthopaedic societies across Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Subgroup analyses explored how gender, AI knowledge, and technical inclination shape attitudes towards AI.

Results: Of 174 total respondents, 86.2% (n = 150) intended to pursue a career in orthopaedic surgery and were included in the analysis. The majority (74.5%) reported 'basic' or 'no' knowledge about AI. Approximately 29.3% believed AI would significantly impact orthopaedics within 5 years, with another 35.3% projecting 5-10 years. AI was predominantly seen as an assistive tool (77.8%), without significant fear of job displacement. The most valued AI applications were identified as preoperative implant planning (85.3%), administrative tasks (84%), and image analysis (81.3%). Concerns arose regarding skill atrophy due to overreliance (69.3%), liability (68%), and diminished patient interaction (56%). The majority maintained a 'neutral' view on AI (53%), though 32.9% were 'enthusiastic'. A stronger focus on AI in medical education was requested by 81.9%. Most participants (72.8%) felt recent AI advancements did not alter their career decisions towards or away from the orthopaedic specialty. Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between AI literacy (p = 0.015) and technical inclination (p = 0.003). AI literacy did not increase significantly during medical education (p = 0.091).

Conclusions: Future orthopaedic surgeons exhibit a favourable outlook on AI, foreseeing its significant influence in the near future. AI literacy remains relatively low and showed no improvement during medical school. There is notable demand for improved AI-related education. The choice of orthopaedics as a specialty appears to be robust against the sway of recent AI advancements.

Level Of Evidence: Cross-sectional survey study; level IV.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence awareness and perceptions among pediatric orthopedic surgeons: A cross-sectional observational study.

Alomran A, Alomar M, Akhdher A, Al Qanber A, Albik A, Alumran A World J Orthop. 2024; 15(11):1023-1035.

PMID: 39600858 PMC: 11586741. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i11.1023.

Specialty choices among new generation of doctors - insights from a Polish survey study.

Kupis R, Michalik B, Polak M, Kulbat M, Domagala A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27855.

PMID: 39537818 PMC: 11561056. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79079-7.

References

Acosta J, Falcone G, Rajpurkar P, Topol E . Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat Med. 2022; 28(9):1773-1784. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01981-2. View

Ahmed Z, Bhinder K, Tariq A, Junaid Tahir M, Mehmood Q, Tabassum M . Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Pakistan: A cross-sectional online survey. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 76:103493. PMC: 8928127. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103493. View

AlZaabi A, AlMaskari S, AalAbdulsalam A . Are physicians and medical students ready for artificial intelligence applications in healthcare?. Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231152167. PMC: 9903019. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231152167. View

Barreiro-Ares A, Morales-Santiago A, Sendra-Portero F, Souto-Bayarri M . Impact of the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: What Do Students Think?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2). PMC: 9867061. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021589. View

Benjamens S, Dhunnoo P, Mesko B . The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:118. PMC: 7486909. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0. View

Bisdas S, Topriceanu C, Zakrzewska Z, Irimia A, Shakallis L, Subhash J . Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Multinational Multi-Center Survey on the Medical and Dental Students' Perception. Front Public Health. 2022; 9:795284. PMC: 8739771. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.795284. View

Blease C, Kharko A, Bernstein M, Bradley C, Houston M, Walsh I . Machine learning in medical education: a survey of the experiences and opinions of medical students in Ireland. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022; 29(1). PMC: 8808371. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100480. View

Boillat T, Nawaz F, Rivas H . Readiness to Embrace Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Doctors and Students: Questionnaire-Based Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2022; 8(2):e34973. PMC: 9044144. DOI: 10.2196/34973. View

Burns D, Leung N, Hardisty M, Whyne C, Henry P, McLachlin S . Shoulder physiotherapy exercise recognition: machine learning the inertial signals from a smartwatch. Physiol Meas. 2018; 39(7):075007. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aacfd9. View

10.

Cabitza F, Locoro A, Banfi G . Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018; 6:75. PMC: 6030383. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00075. View

11.

Celi L, Fine B, Stone D . An awakening in medicine: the partnership of humanity and intelligent machines. Lancet Digit Health. 2020; 1(6):e255-e257. PMC: 7331949. DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30127-x. View

12.

Chan K, Zary N . Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019; 5(1):e13930. PMC: 6598417. DOI: 10.2196/13930. View

13.

Chen M, Zhang B, Cai Z, Seery S, Gonzalez M, Ali N . Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:990604. PMC: 9472134. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.990604. View

14.

De Simone B, Abu-Zidan F, Gumbs A, Chouillard E, Di Saverio S, Sartelli M . Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma surgery, the ARIES project: an international web-based survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2022; 17(1):10. PMC: 8832812. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00413-3. View

15.

Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem N, Khater B . Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: A national survey study. Front Artif Intell. 2022; 5:1015418. PMC: 9668059. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.1015418. View

16.

Erickson B, Shishani Y, Gobezie R . Remote Patient Monitoring of Postoperative Rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2023; 34(2):489-497. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2022.12.011. View

17.

Eysenbach G . Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e34. PMC: 1550605. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34. View

18.

Gillissen A, Kochanek T, Zupanic M, Ehlers J . Medical Students' Perceptions towards Digitization and Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(4). PMC: 9027704. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10040723. View

19.

Gong B, Nugent J, Guest W, Parker W, Chang P, Khosa F . Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Canadian Medical Students' Preference for Radiology Specialty: ANational Survey Study. Acad Radiol. 2018; 26(4):566-577. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.007. View

20.

Jha N, Shankar P, Al-Betar M, Mukhia R, Hada K, Palaian S . Undergraduate Medical Students' and Interns' Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022; 13:927-937. PMC: 9419901. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S368519. View