Are Physicians and Medical Students Ready for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Healthcare?

Overview

Journal Digit Health

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2023 Feb 10

PMID 36762024

Authors

Adhari AlZaabi

Saleh AlMaskari

Abdulrahman AalAbdulsalam

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) Healthcare applications are listed in the national visions of some Gulf Cooperation Council countries. A successful use of AI depends on the attitude and perception of medical experts of its applications.

Objective: To evaluate physicians and medical students' attitude and perception on AI applications in healthcare.

Method: A web-based survey was disseminated by email to physicians and medical students.

Results: A total of 293 (82 physicians and 211 medical students) individuals have participated (response rate is 27%). Seven participants (9%) reported knowing nothing about AI, while 208 (69%) were aware that it is an emerging field and would like to learn about it. Concerns about AI impact on physicians' employability were not prominent. Instead, the majority (n=159) agreed that new positions will be created and the job market for those who embrace AI will increase. They reported willingness to adapt AI in practice if it was incorporated in international guidelines (30.5%), published in respected scientific journals (17.1%), or included in formal training (12.2%). Almost two of the three participants agreed that dedicated courses will help them to implement AI. The most commonly reported problem of AI is its inability to provide opinions in unexpected scenarios. Half of the participants think that both the manufacturer and physicians should be legally liable for medical errors occur due to AI-based decision support tools while more than one-third (36.77%) think that physicians who make the final decision should be legally liable. Senior physicians were found to be less familiar with AI and more concerned about physicians' legal liability in case of a medical error.

Conclusion: Physicians and medical students showed positive attitudes and willingness to learn about AI applications in healthcare. Introducing AI learning objectives or short courses in medical curriculum would help to equip physicians with the needed skills for AI-augmented healthcare system.

Citing Articles

Healthcare ethics and artificial intelligence: a UK doctor survey.

Warrington D, Holm S BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e089090.

PMID: 39806591 PMC: 11667393. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089090.

Readiness to Embrace Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Students in Saudi Arabia: A National Survey.

Al Shahrani A, Alhumaidan N, AlHindawi Z, Althobaiti A, Aloufi K, Almughamisi R Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765931 PMC: 11727990. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242504.

The wizard of artificial intelligence: Are physicians prepared?.

Radhwi O, Khafaji M J Family Community Med. 2024; 31(4):344-350.

PMID: 39619463 PMC: 11604183. DOI: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_144_24.

Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Among Newly Graduated Interns: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sanad A, Alsaegh A, Abdulla H, Mohamed A, Alqassab A, Sharaf S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71216.

PMID: 39525111 PMC: 11549944. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71216.

How can physicians adopt AI-based applications in the United Arab Emirates to improve patient outcomes?.

Mansour T, Bick M Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241284936.

PMID: 39351313 PMC: 11440542. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241284936.

References

. Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging. 2019; 10(1):105. PMC: 6823335. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0798-3. View

Sheth D, Giger M . Artificial intelligence in the interpretation of breast cancer on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 51(5):1310-1324. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26878. View

Davenport T, Kalakota R . The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019; 6(2):94-98. PMC: 6616181. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94. View

Fritsch S, Blankenheim A, Wahl A, Hetfeld P, Maassen O, Deffge S . Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients. Digit Health. 2022; 8:20552076221116772. PMC: 9380417. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221116772. View

Verghese A, Shah N, Harrington R . What This Computer Needs Is a Physician: Humanism and Artificial Intelligence. JAMA. 2017; 319(1):19-20. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19198. View

McKinney S, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H . International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020; 577(7788):89-94. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. View

Romero-Brufau S, Wyatt K, Boyum P, Mickelson M, Moore M, Cognetta-Rieke C . What's in a name? A comparison of attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI) versus augmented human intelligence (AHI). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1):167. PMC: 7372792. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01158-2. View

Blease C, Bernstein M, Gaab J, Kaptchuk T, Kossowsky J, Mandl K . Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK. PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0207418. PMC: 6291067. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207418. View

Sit C, Srinivasan R, Amlani A, Muthuswamy K, Azam A, Monzon L . Attitudes and perceptions of UK medical students towards artificial intelligence and radiology: a multicentre survey. Insights Imaging. 2020; 11(1):14. PMC: 7002761. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0830-7. View

10.

Krittanawong C . The rise of artificial intelligence and the uncertain future for physicians. Eur J Intern Med. 2017; 48:e13-e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.06.017. View

11.

Sarwar S, Dent A, Faust K, Richer M, Djuric U, Van Ommeren R . Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:28. PMC: 6550202. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0106-0. View

12.

Masters K . Artificial Intelligence developments in medical education: a conceptual and practical framework. MedEdPublish (2016). 2023; 9:239. PMC: 10697470. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2020.000239.1. View

13.

Ejaz H, McGrath H, Wong B, Guise A, Vercauteren T, Shapey J . Artificial intelligence and medical education: A global mixed-methods study of medical students' perspectives. Digit Health. 2022; 8:20552076221089099. PMC: 9067043. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221089099. View

14.

Benjamens S, Dhunnoo P, Mesko B . The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:118. PMC: 7486909. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0. View

15.

Abdullah R, Fakieh B . Health Care Employees' Perceptions of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Applications: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(5):e17620. PMC: 7256754. DOI: 10.2196/17620. View

16.

Lai M, Brian M, Mamzer M . Perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: findings from a qualitative survey study among actors in France. J Transl Med. 2020; 18(1):14. PMC: 6953249. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-02204-y. View

17.

Guan J . Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medicine: Promises, Ethical Challenges and Governance. Chin Med Sci J. 2019; 34(2):76-83. DOI: 10.24920/003611. View

18.

Castagno S, Khalifa M . Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study. Front Artif Intell. 2021; 3:578983. PMC: 7861214. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.578983. View

19.

Kelly C, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D . Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019; 17(1):195. PMC: 6821018. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2. View

20.

Safi S, Thiessen T, Schmailzl K . Acceptance and Resistance of New Digital Technologies in Medicine: Qualitative Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018; 7(12):e11072. PMC: 6299231. DOI: 10.2196/11072. View