» Articles » PMID: 39123698

Introducing the Mellorater-The Five Domains Model in a Welfare Monitoring App for Animal Guardians

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39123698
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When monitoring an animal's welfare, it helps to have comprehensive and day-to-day information about the animal's life. The goal is to ensure that animal guardians (carers, keepers, and owners) use such information to act in the animals' best interests. This article introduces the Mellorater, an animal welfare monitoring app based on the 2020 Five Domains Model. This framework provides a means of capturing comprehensive information about the world in which individual animals exist. The Mellorater asks animal guardians to rate their agreement with 18 statements covering any focal animal's nutrition, environment, health, and behavioural interactions using a five-point Likert scale. No specialist training is required other than following straightforward instructions on using the app, which are provided. The Mellorater is not proposed as a validated welfare auditing tool because it relies on reflective self-reporting and, thus, is vulnerable to the user's subjectivity. If users' subjectivity is stable over time, then the longitudinal data may be considered useful proxies for trends in quality of life. That said, it has the potential to be used by trained auditors if scientifically validated, species-specific indicators are applied. The Mellorater collects anonymous data and has been approved for a study to explore how the use of such scales may differ among guardians of different species and in different contexts. In this paper, we conduct the following: (1) summarise the app's purposes; (2) clarify its capabilities and limitations; and (3) invite animal welfare scholars, veterinarians, health and welfare professionals, and animal guardians to use it.

Citing Articles

Can a Digital Application for Animal Welfare Self-Assessments by Farmers Help Improve the Welfare of Free-Range and Organic Pigs?.

Graat E, Vanden Hole C, Rodenburg T, Giersberg M, Tuyttens F Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682340 PMC: 11639997. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233374.

References
1.
Justice W, OBrien M, Szyszka O, Shotton J, Gilmour J, Riordan P . Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections. Vet Rec. 2017; 181(6):143. DOI: 10.1136/vr.104309. View

2.
Sherwen S, Hemsworth L, Beausoleil N, Embury A, Mellor D . An Animal Welfare Risk Assessment Process for Zoos. Animals (Basel). 2018; 8(8). PMC: 6116011. DOI: 10.3390/ani8080130. View

3.
Philpotts I, Dillon J, Rooney N . Improving the Welfare of Companion Dogs-Is Owner Education the Solution?. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(9). PMC: 6770859. DOI: 10.3390/ani9090662. View

4.
Schork I, Manzo I, Oliveira M, da Costa F, Young R, Azevedo C . The cyclic interaction between daytime behavior and the sleep behavior of laboratory dogs. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):478. PMC: 8748904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04502-2. View

5.
Furtado T, Perkins E, Pinchbeck G, McGowan C, Watkins F, Christley R . Exploring horse owners' understanding of obese body condition and weight management in UK leisure horses. Equine Vet J. 2020; 53(4):752-762. DOI: 10.1111/evj.13360. View