» Articles » PMID: 27732667

Can Sleep and Resting Behaviours Be Used As Indicators of Welfare in Shelter Dogs (Canis Lupus Familiaris)?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Oct 13
PMID 27732667
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research on humans and animals suggests that the analysis of sleep patterns may reliably inform us about welfare status, but little research of this kind has been carried out for non-human animals in an applied context. This study explored the use of sleep and resting behaviour as indicators of welfare by describing the activity patterns of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) housed in rescue shelters, and comparing their sleep patterns to other behavioural and cognitive measures of welfare. Sleep and activity patterns were observed over five non-consecutive days in a population of 15 dogs. Subsequently, the characteristics of sleep and resting behaviour were described and the impact of activity on patterns of sleep and resting behaviour analysed. Shelter dogs slept for 2.8% of the day, 14.3% less than previously reported and experienced less sleep fragmentation at night (32 sleep bouts). There were no statistically significant relationships between behaviours exhibited during the day and sleep behaviour. A higher proportion of daytime resting behaviour was significantly associated with a positive judgement bias, less repetitive behaviour and increased time spent coded as 'relaxed' across days by shelter staff. These results suggest that, in the context of a busy shelter environment, the ability to rest more during the day could be a sign of improved welfare. Considering the non-linear relationship between sleep and welfare in humans, the relationship between sleep and behavioural indicators of welfare, including judgement bias, in shelter dogs may be more complex than this study could detect.

Citing Articles

A qualitative exploration of owner experiences following dog adoption.

Moyer B, Zulch H, Ventura B, Burman O Anim Welf. 2025; 34:e9.

PMID: 39935773 PMC: 11810508. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2025.4.


Companion animal foster caregiving: a scoping review exploring animal and caregiver welfare, barriers to caregiver recruitment and retention, and best practices for foster care programs in animal shelters.

Phillips G, Gunter L PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18623.

PMID: 39686998 PMC: 11648680. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18623.


Introducing the Mellorater-The Five Domains Model in a Welfare Monitoring App for Animal Guardians.

Wilkins C, McGreevy P, Cosh S, Henshall C, Jones B, Lykins A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123698 PMC: 11310947. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152172.


Automated Observations of Dogs' Resting Behaviour Patterns Using Artificial Intelligence and Their Similarity to Behavioural Observations.

Schork I, Zamansky A, Farhat N, Azevedo C, Young R Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612348 PMC: 11011086. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071109.


Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding.

Menor-Campos D Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38473141 PMC: 10930939. DOI: 10.3390/ani14050756.


References
1.
Wurbel H, Freire R, Nicol C . Prevention of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice: Effects on behaviour and implications for stereotypy as a coping response. Behav Processes. 2014; 42(1):61-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00062-4. View

2.
Denham H, Bradshaw J, Rooney N . Repetitive behaviour in kennelled domestic dog: stereotypical or not?. Physiol Behav. 2014; 128:288-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.007. View

3.
Part C, Kiddie J, Hayes W, Mills D, Neville R, Morton D . Physiological, physical and behavioural changes in dogs (Canis familiaris) when kennelled: testing the validity of stress parameters. Physiol Behav. 2014; 133:260-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.018. View

4.
Nutt D, Wilson S, Paterson L . Sleep disorders as core symptoms of depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008; 10(3):329-36. PMC: 3181883. View

5.
Rochlitz I, Podberscek A, Broom D . Welfare of cats in a quarantine cattery. Vet Rec. 1998; 143(2):35-9. DOI: 10.1136/vr.143.2.35. View