» Articles » PMID: 39121438

Molecular and Clinicopathologic Impact of GNAS Variants Across Solid Tumors

Abstract

Purpose: The molecular drivers underlying mucinous tumor pathogenicity are poorly understood. mutations predict metastatic burden and treatment resistance in mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. We investigated the pan-cancer clinicopathologic relevance of variants.

Methods: We assessed 58,043 patients with Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (IMPACT)-sequenced solid tumors to identify oncogenic variants, including , associated with mucinous tumor phenotype. We then performed comprehensive molecular analyses to compare mutant (mut) and wild-type tumors across cancers. Gene expression patterns associated with mut tumors were assessed in a The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. Associations between variant status and peritoneal metastasis, first-line systemic therapy response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using a propensity-matched subcohort of patients with metastatic disease.

Results: Mucinous tumors were enriched for oncogenic variants. was mutated in >1% of small bowel, cervical, colorectal, pancreatic, esophagogastric, hepatobiliary, and GI neuroendocrine cancers. Across these cancers, mut tumors exhibited a generally conserved C-to-T mutation-high, aneuploidy-low molecular profile with co-occurring prevalent variants (65% of GNAS-mut tumors) and fewer alterations. mut tumors exhibited recurrently comutated alternative tumor suppressors (, ) and upregulation of MAPK and cell surface modulators. mut tumors demonstrate an increased prevalence of peritoneal metastases (odds ratio [OR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5]; .006), worse response to first-line systemic therapy (OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.3 to 3.8]; .003), and shorter PFS (median, 5.6 7.0 months; .047). In a multivariable analysis, mutated status was independently prognostic of worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.56]; adjusted .04).

Conclusion: Across the assessed cancers, mut tumors exhibit a conserved molecular and clinical phenotype defined by mucinous tumor status, increased peritoneal metastasis, poor response to first-line systemic therapy, and worse survival.

Citing Articles

Contract to kill: GNAS mutation.

Raut P, Mathivanan P, Batra S, Ponnusamy M Mol Cancer. 2025; 24(1):70.

PMID: 40050874 PMC: 11887407. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-025-02247-4.

References
1.
ODonnell M, Badger S, Beattie G, Carson J, Garstin W . Malignant neoplasms of the appendix. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22(10):1239-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0304-0. View

2.
Hu Q, Shokat K . Disease-Causing Mutations in the G Protein Gαs Subvert the Roles of GDP and GTP. Cell. 2018; 173(5):1254-1264.e11. PMC: 5959768. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.018. View

3.
Benesch M, Mathieson A . Epidemiology of Mucinous Adenocarcinomas. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(11). PMC: 7692300. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113193. View

4.
Hugen N, Brown G, Glynne-Jones R, de Wilt J, Nagtegaal I . Advances in the care of patients with mucinous colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015; 13(6):361-9. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.140. View

5.
. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 45(D1):D158-D169. PMC: 5210571. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1099. View