» Articles » PMID: 39110143

Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in JAK Inhibitor-naïve Patients with Myelofibrosis: an Efficacy/safety Analysis in the Japanese Subgroup of the Phase 3 Randomized SIMPLIFY-1 Trial

Abstract

Momelotinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 and activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor, improved symptoms, splenomegaly, and anemia in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). This sub-analysis of SIMPLIFY-1 evaluated the efficacy and safety of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Japanese patients with JAK inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve MF. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive momelotinib 200 mg once daily or ruxolitinib 20 mg twice daily (or modified based on label) for 24 weeks, after which patients could receive open-label momelotinib. The primary endpoint was splenic response rate (SRR; ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at 24 weeks; main secondary endpoints were total symptom score (TSS) response (≥ 50% reduction) and transfusion independence (TI) rates. Fifteen Japanese patients (momelotinib, n = 6; ruxolitinib, n = 9) were enrolled; all completed treatment. At Week 24, SRR was 50.0% with momelotinib and 44.4% with ruxolitinib. TSS response rates were 33.3% and 0%, and TI rates were 83.3% and 44.4%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 83.3% with momelotinib and 88.9% with ruxolitinib. Grade 3/4 TRAE rates were 0% and 55.6%, with specific events being anemia (55.6%) and vertigo (11.1%) with ruxolitinib. Momelotinib was well tolerated, improved spleen and symptom responses, and reduced transfusion requirements in Japanese patients with JAKi-naïve MF.

References
1.
Harrison C, Vannucchi A, Platzbecker U, Cervantes F, Gupta V, Lavie D . Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017; 5(2):e73-e81. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30237-5. View

2.
Tremblay D, Mesa R . Momelotinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis with anemia. Future Oncol. 2022; 18(20):2559-2571. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0276. View

3.
Hultcrantz M, Ravn Landtblom A, Andreasson B, Samuelsson J, Dickman P, Kristinsson S . Incidence of myeloproliferative neoplasms - trends by subgroup and age in a population-based study in Sweden. J Intern Med. 2020; 287(4):448-454. PMC: 7598815. DOI: 10.1111/joim.13019. View

4.
Mughal T, Vaddi K, Sarlis N, Verstovsek S . Myelofibrosis-associated complications: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and effects on outcomes. Int J Gen Med. 2014; 7:89-101. PMC: 3912063. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S51800. View

5.
Scott B, Becker P . JAK/STAT Pathway Inhibitors and Neurologic Toxicity: Above All Else Do No Harm?. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1(5):651-2. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1591. View