» Articles » PMID: 27832516

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in a Multicenter, Open-label Study in Japanese Patients with Myelofibrosis

Overview
Journal Int J Hematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2016 Nov 11
PMID 27832516
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated durable improvements in splenomegaly, symptoms, and overall survival in controlled clinical trials in patients with myelofibrosis. The single-arm study reported here was initiated to collect further safety and efficacy data in Japanese patients with myelofibrosis and is the largest study of ruxolitinib in this population. The primary objective was to assess safety. Secondary endpoints included changes in spleen size and patient-reported outcomes. The primary analysis occurred when all patients (N = 51) completed 24 weeks or discontinued. Overall, 86.3% of patients completed treatment; 9.8% discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). Consistent with previous studies, the most common AEs were anemia (62.7%) and thrombocytopenia (29.4%). Furthermore, levels of select immunologic biomarkers remained stable, and no deaths occurred. At week 24, 30.0% of evaluable patients experienced ≥50% reductions from baseline in palpable spleen length; 26.0% had ≥35% reductions in spleen volume. Additionally, ruxolitinib led to clinically significant improvements in symptoms and quality of life. Overall, findings from this study indicate that ruxolitinib is safe and effective in Japanese patients with myelofibrosis, with these benefits extending to patients with intermediate-1-risk myelofibrosis and to those with low platelet counts.

Citing Articles

Momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: an efficacy/safety analysis in the Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 randomized SIMPLIFY-1 trial.

Shimoda K, Komatsu N, Matsumura I, Ikeda K, Hino M, Hidaka M Int J Hematol. 2024; 120(3):314-324.

PMID: 39110143 PMC: 11362197. DOI: 10.1007/s12185-024-03822-z.


High Incidence of Herpes Zoster in Patients Using Ruxolitinib for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Need for Prophylaxis.

Te Linde E, Boots L, Daenen L, de Witte M, Bruns A Hemasphere. 2022; 6(11):e793.

PMID: 36325270 PMC: 9619234. DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000793.


Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: a retrospective and multicenter experience in Turkey.

Soyer N, Ali R, Turgut M, Haznedaroglu I, Yilmaz F, Aydogdu I Turk J Med Sci. 2020; 51(3):1033-1042.

PMID: 33315343 PMC: 8283435. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1812-70.


Tuberculosis in Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis During Ruxolitinib Therapy: Case Series and Literature Review.

Peng Y, Meng L, Hu X, Han Z, Hong Z Infect Drug Resist. 2020; 13:3309-3316.

PMID: 33061478 PMC: 7532060. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S267997.


Fedratinib, a newly approved treatment for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis.

Talpaz M, Kiladjian J Leukemia. 2020; 35(1):1-17.

PMID: 32647323 PMC: 7787977. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0954-2.


References
1.
Tefferi A . Primary myelofibrosis: 2014 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2014; 89(9):915-25. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23703. View

2.
Cervantes F, Passamonti F, Barosi G . Life expectancy and prognostic factors in the classic BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorders. Leukemia. 2008; 22(5):905-14. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.72. View

3.
Tefferi A . Primary myelofibrosis: 2013 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2013; 88(2):141-50. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23384. View

4.
Shen C, Hwang C, Chen Y, Chen C . Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with ruxolitinib. Ann Hematol. 2013; 93(6):1075-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-013-1936-5. View

5.
Abdel-Wahab O, Levine R . Primary myelofibrosis: update on definition, pathogenesis, and treatment. Annu Rev Med. 2008; 60:233-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.60.041707.160528. View