» Articles » PMID: 39099624

Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Postmastectomy Irradiation for Breast Cancer: Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.

Methods: This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.

Results: Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation ( = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes ( = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) ( 0.001), and tumor bed planning target volume (PTV-TB) ( = 0.002) were significantly correlated with higher rates of acute skin toxicity.

Conclusion: Hypofractionated WBI demonstrated similar acute skin adverse reactions compared to conventional WBI. These findings indicate that hypofractionated radiotherapy offers comparable tolerance, equivalent curative effect, convenience, and economic benefits, supporting its clinical promotion.

References
1.
Bourgier C, Cowen D, Castan F, Lemanski C, Gourgou S, Rivera S . Quality assurance program and early toxicities in the phase III BONBIS randomized trial evaluating the role of a localized radiation boost in ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiother Oncol. 2021; 164:57-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.014. View

2.
Van Limbergen E, van der Schueren E, Van Tongelen K . Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system. Radiother Oncol. 1989; 16(3):159-67. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90016-9. View

3.
Owen J, Ashton A, Bliss J, Homewood J, Harper C, Hanson J . Effect of radiotherapy fraction size on tumour control in patients with early-stage breast cancer after local tumour excision: long-term results of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(6):467-71. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70699-4. View

4.
Tortorelli G, Di Murro L, Barbarino R, Cicchetti S, di Cristino D, Falco M . Standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of acute skin toxicity and dose inhomogeneities. BMC Cancer. 2013; 13:230. PMC: 3660202. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-230. View

5.
Bentzen S, Agrawal R, Aird E, Barrett J, Barrett-Lee P, Bliss J . The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9(4):331-41. PMC: 2323709. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9. View